BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411569)

  • 1. Retentive force of O-ring attachment to use Immediate Provisional Implant (IPI)-retained overdenture.
    Kobayashi M; Ohkubo C; Suzuki Y; Aoki T; Sato J; Hosoi T
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 13(4):147-9. PubMed ID: 16411569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of retentive anchor systems for overdentures.
    Svetlize CA; Bodereau EF
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jun; 35(6):443-8. PubMed ID: 15202589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication of a surgical template for implant/bar-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Fakhry A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 16089048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment.
    Rodrigues RC; Faria AC; Macedo AP; Sartori IA; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19681968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study.
    Maeda Y; Horisaka M; Yagi K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18081872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The measurement of retentive forces in mandibular complete overdenture with Magfit magnetic attachments].
    Du L; Xu C; Chao Y
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 21(5):366-8. PubMed ID: 14650991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL; Kang K; Hirayama H; Garefis PD; Petridis H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ERA implant-supported overdenture.
    Davidoff SR; Davis RP
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 May; 16(5):512, 514, 516 passim; quiz 522. PubMed ID: 8624990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A technique for indirect fabrication of an implant-supported, screw-retained, fixed provisional restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 19961998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory processing of housing-retained attachments for implant-supported overdentures.
    Choy E; Reimer D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):516-8. PubMed ID: 11357081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fabrication of a duplicate screw-retained complete arch fixed dental prosthesis.
    Thammasithiboon P; Verrett RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 100(2):159-61. PubMed ID: 18672133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.