BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411569)

  • 21. In vitro study of the retention and mechanical fatigue behavior of four implant overdenture stud-type attachments.
    Fromentin O; Picard B; Tavernier B
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 11(3):391-7; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 10379298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue.
    Ichikawa T; Horiuchi M; Wigianto R; Matsumoto N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8957878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of fatigue damage on the force required to remove a restoration in a cement-retained implant system.
    Kaar D; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT; Platt JA
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(5):289-94. PubMed ID: 16958729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of screw hole filling on retention of implant crowns.
    Chu KM; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Hems E
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Dec; 13(4):154-8. PubMed ID: 16411571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resistance to dislodgement of zirconia copings cemented onto titanium abutments of different heights.
    Abbo B; Razzoog ME; Vivas J; Sierraalta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18182182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An alternative direct technique for the fabrication of an implant-supported, screw-retained fixed interim restoration.
    Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Purcell B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 22304750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retention force and fatigue strength of overdenture attachment systems.
    Botega DM; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):884-9. PubMed ID: 15369470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preservation of soft tissue contours with immediate screw-retained provisional implant crown.
    Al-Harbi SA; Edgin WA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 17936132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Creating overdenture stability with a locking attachment.
    Gintjee B; Bagley D
    Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab; 1994 Nov; 11(9):39-43. PubMed ID: 7491474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillary zirconia implant fixed partial dentures opposing an acrylic resin implant fixed complete denture: a two-year clinical report.
    Chang PP; Henegbarth EA; Lang LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 17618914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A technique for converting an existing denture into a cast metal-reinforced implant-retained overdenture.
    Orenstein IH; Weinstein BF; Gelman AS; Fiks S; McCartney JW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 21095403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Designing abutments for cement retained implant supported restorations.
    Chee W; Jivraj S
    Br Dent J; 2006 Nov; 201(9):559-63. PubMed ID: 17099660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.