These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411569)

  • 41. The use of customized implant frameworks with gingiva-colored composite resin to restore deficient gingival architecture.
    Hagiwara Y; Nakajima K; Tsuge T; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 17341380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The removable implant overdenture--"why didn't someone tell me that?".
    Rigdon TF
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 8957894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Temporary implant-supported prosthesis for immediate loading according to a chair-side concept: technical note and results from 37 consecutive cases.
    Ostman PO; Hellman M; Sennerby L; Wennerberg A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 18462202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical protocol for an overdenture bar prosthesis fabricated with CAD/CAM technology.
    Carpentieri JR
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004; 16(10):755-7. PubMed ID: 15739917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Short-term retention properties of cements for retrievable implant-supported prostheses.
    Alfaro MA; Papazoglou E; McGlumphy EA; Holloway JA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15058180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implant bar design, the next generation.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 24(6):37-44. PubMed ID: 9052006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of die spacer on retention and fitting of complete cast crowns.
    Olivera AB; Saito T
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 16827737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effect of load cycling on metal ceramic screw-retained implant restorations with unrestored and restored screw access holes.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18182181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Split bar design: maxillary implant-retained removable prosthesis.
    Tague JB
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Sep; 18(8):513-4, 516. PubMed ID: 17061689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomechanical study of a prosthetic solution based on an angled abutment: case of upper lateral incisor.
    Dubois G; Daas M; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):989-98. PubMed ID: 17158084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of platform switching on strain developed around implants supporting mandibular overdenture.
    Sabet ME; El-Korashy DI; El-Mahrouky NA
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19667825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Immediate placement and immediate provisional abutment modeling in anterior single-tooth implant restorations using a CAD/CAM application: a clinical report.
    Tselios N; Parel SM; Jones JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 16543013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Anatomically correct soft tissue profiles using fixed detachable provisional implant restorations.
    Saba S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Nov; 63(10):767-8, 770. PubMed ID: 9401298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 19418867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of yellow Hader clips: an in vitro study.
    Varghese RM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 17581177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.