135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411642)
21. Effect of Outflow Tract Contributions to 82Rb-PET Global Myocardial Blood Flow Computations.
Van Tosh A; Reichek N; Palestro CJ; Nichols KJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2016 Jun; 44(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26966126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with generator-produced 62Cu-PTSM and positron emission tomography.
Herrero P; Markham J; Weinheimer CJ; Anderson CJ; Welch MJ; Green MA; Bergmann SR
Circulation; 1993 Jan; 87(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 8419005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow and extracellular volume fraction using
Velasco C; Mota-Cobián A; Mota RA; Pellico J; Herranz F; Galán-Arriola C; Ibáñez B; Ruiz-Cabello J; Mateo J; España S
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 27(4):1249-1260. PubMed ID: 30927149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved spillover correction model to quantify myocardial blood flow by 11C-acetate PET: comparison with 15O-H 2O PET.
Mori Y; Manabe O; Naya M; Tomiyama Y; Yoshinaga K; Magota K; Oyama-Manabe N; Hirata K; Tsutsui H; Tamaki N; Katoh C
Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Jan; 29(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 25209232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A simplified method for quantification of myocardial blood flow using nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET.
Choi Y; Huang SC; Hawkins RA; Kuhle WG; Dahlbom M; Hoh CK; Czernin J; Phelps ME; Schelbert HR
J Nucl Med; 1993 Mar; 34(3):488-97. PubMed ID: 8280197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H(2)(15)O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation.
Schäfers KP; Spinks TJ; Camici PG; Bloomfield PM; Rhodes CG; Law MP; Baker CS; Rimoldi O
J Nucl Med; 2002 Aug; 43(8):1031-40. PubMed ID: 12163628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Low-dose quantitative myocardial blood flow imaging using 15O-water and PET without attenuation correction.
Lubberink M; Harms HJ; Halbmeijer R; de Haan S; Knaapen P; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 20237035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimation of myocardial blood flow for longitudinal studies with 13N-labeled ammonia and positron emission tomography.
DeGrado TR; Hanson MW; Turkington TG; Delong DM; Brezinski DA; Vallée JP; Hedlund LW; Zhang J; Cobb F; Sullivan MJ; Coleman RE
J Nucl Cardiol; 1996; 3(6 Pt 1):494-507. PubMed ID: 8989674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic N-13 ammonia PET imaging: comparison of 2 tracer kinetic models.
Khorsand A; Graf S; Pirich C; Muzik O; Kletter K; Dudczak R; Maurer G; Sochor H; Schuster E; Porenta G
J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 16084429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: comparison with (13)N-ammonia PET.
El Fakhri G; Kardan A; Sitek A; Dorbala S; Abi-Hatem N; Lahoud Y; Fischman A; Coughlan M; Yasuda T; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 50(7):1062-71. PubMed ID: 19525467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantification of subendocardial and subepicardial blood flow using 15O-labeled water and PET: experimental validation.
Rimoldi O; Schäfers KP; Boellaard R; Turkheimer F; Stegger L; Law MP; Lammerstma AA; Camici PG
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 16391201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of coronary endothelial dysfunction in healthy young smokers: Cold pressor test using [(15)O]H(2)O PET.
Hwang KH; Lee BI; Kim SJ; Lee JS; Lee DS
Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1199-203. PubMed ID: 19303784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of Myocardial Blood Flow Estimation From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac CT Compared With PET.
Alessio AM; Bindschadler M; Busey JM; Shuman WP; Caldwell JH; Branch KR
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jun; 12(6):e008323. PubMed ID: 31195817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Residual Activity Correction in Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion
Markousis-Mavrogenis G; Juárez-Orozco LE; Alexanderson E
Hellenic J Cardiol; 2017; 58(3):245-249. PubMed ID: 28137454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in healthy volunteers: comparison with positron emission tomography.
Dijkmans PA; Knaapen P; Sieswerda GT; Aiazian E; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC; Kamp O
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Mar; 19(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 16500491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of coronary vasodilator reserve by N-13 ammonia PET using the microsphere method and Patlak plot analysis.
Tadamura E; Tamaki N; Yonekura Y; Kudoh T; Magata Y; Torizuka T; Tateno M; Nohara R; Sasayama S; Konishi J
Ann Nucl Med; 1995 Aug; 9(3):109-18. PubMed ID: 8534582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging and [
Everaars H; van Diemen PA; Bom MJ; Schumacher SP; de Winter RW; van de Ven PM; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; Nijveldt R; Danad I; Driessen RS; Knaapen P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jul; 47(7):1688-1697. PubMed ID: 31822958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of clinical non-commercial tools for automated quantification of myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water PET/CT.
Harms HJ; Nesterov SV; Han C; Danad I; Leonora R; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Apr; 15(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 24107905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and PET: comparison of tracer models.
Choi Y; Huang SC; Hawkins RA; Kim JY; Kim BT; Hoh CK; Chen K; Phelps ME; Schelbert HR
J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 40(6):1045-55. PubMed ID: 10452323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
