90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411807)
1. An across-frequency processing deficit in listeners with hearing impairment is supported by acoustic correlation.
Healy EW; Kannabiran A; Bacon SP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 16411807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Healy EW; Bacon SP
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1262-75. PubMed ID: 12546492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An acoustic and perceptual study of final stops produced by profoundly hearing impaired adolescents.
Khouw E; Ciocca V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):172-85. PubMed ID: 16533082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current state of knowledge: perceptual processing by children with hearing impairment.
Jerger S
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):754-65. PubMed ID: 17982363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
Summers V; Cord MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.
Dreisbach LE; Leek MR; Lentz JJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):910-21. PubMed ID: 16378482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Santurette S; Dau T
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
