149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16411994)
1. Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women.
Harrington DJ; MacKenzie IZ; Thompson K; Fleminger M; Greenwood C
BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 16411994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gestational age and induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy.
Gardosi J; Vanner T; Francis A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):792-7. PubMed ID: 9236643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial.
Bennett KA; Crane JM; O'shea P; Lacelle J; Hutchens D; Copel JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 190(4):1077-81. PubMed ID: 15118645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rate of postdates induction using first-trimester ultrasound to determine estimated due date: Wellington Regional Hospital audit.
Tun M; Tuohy J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Jun; 51(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 21631439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective population-based cohort study of maternal obesity as a source of error in gestational age estimation at 11-14 weeks.
Bak GS; Sperling L; Källén K; Salvesen KÅ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1281-1287. PubMed ID: 27517739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated date of delivery based on second trimester fetal head circumference: A population-based validation of 21 451 deliveries.
Kessler J; Johnsen SL; Ebbing C; Karlsen HO; Rasmussen S; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jan; 98(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 30168856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
Doubilet PM
Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters.
Olesen AW; Thomsen SG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16865679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dating and growth in the first trimester.
Bottomley C; Bourne T
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 19282247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation.
Taipale P; Hiilesmaa V
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 97(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11165580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First trimester dating by fetal heart rate assessment: a comparison with crown-rump length measurement.
Obican SG; Khodak-Gelman S; Elmi A; Larsen JW; Friedman AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 24635416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is an ultrasound assessment of gestational age at the first antenatal visit of value? A randomised clinical trial.
Crowther CA; Kornman L; O'Callaghan S; George K; Furness M; Willson K
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Dec; 106(12):1273-9. PubMed ID: 10609721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First-trimester screening in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: significance of gestational dating by oocyte retrieval or sonographic measurement of crown-rump length.
Gjerris AC; Loft A; Pinborg A; Tabor A; Christiansen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 18816495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
Wessel H; Nyberg T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First and third trimester ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight discordance in dichorionic twins.
Banks CL; Nelson SM; Owen P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 May; 138(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17897772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrepancy in term calculation from second trimester ultrasound scan versus last menstrual period in women with type 1 diabetes.
Eidem I; Vangen S; Henriksen T; Vollset SE; Hanssen KF; Joner G; Stene LC
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Aug; 93(8):809-16. PubMed ID: 24807126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex bias in ultrasound measures of gestational age: assessment by sex ratio in post-term births.
Koch S; Lynggaard M; Jensen MS; Henriksen TB; Uldbjerg N
Epidemiology; 2014 Jul; 25(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 24807697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
