148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16412075)
41. Colorectal cancer--a prospective evaluation of symptom duration and GP referral patterns in an inner city teaching hospital.
Khattak I; Eardley NJ; Rooney PS
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jul; 8(6):518-21. PubMed ID: 16784474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Time to Endoscopy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of Wait-Times.
Janssen RM; Takach O; Nap-Hill E; Enns RA
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():8714587. PubMed ID: 27446872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Implications of a negative bronchoscopy on waiting times to treatment for lung cancer patients: results of a prospective tracking study.
Devbhandari MP; Quennell P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 34(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 18667329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evolution of the two-week rule pathway--direct access colonoscopy vs outpatient appointments: one year's experience and patient satisfaction survey.
Maruthachalam K; Stoker E; Chaudhri S; Noblett S; Horgan AF
Colorectal Dis; 2005 Sep; 7(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 16108885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?
Khawaja AR; Allan SM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Sep; 26(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 11034802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Wait times from presentation to treatment for colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
Singh H; De Coster C; Shu E; Fradette K; Latosinsky S; Pitz M; Cheang M; Turner D
Can J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 24(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 20186354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Implications of sub-specialisation on the waiting times of general surgical clinics.
Shah RR; Barker R; Haray PN
Surgeon; 2007 Aug; 5(4):206-8. PubMed ID: 17849955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnostic performance of urgent referrals for suspected gynaecological malignancies.
Burbos N; Musonda P; Rufford B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1495-500. PubMed ID: 21331542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Relationship between the 'two-week rule' and colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Mangion D; Brennan A
Br J Nurs; 2014 Jun 26-Jul 9; 23(12):660-7. PubMed ID: 25039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. UK waiting time targets in lung cancer treatment: are they achievable? Results of a prospective tracking study.
Devbhandari MP; Soon SY; Quennell P; Barber P; Krysiak P; Shah R; Jones MT
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 Jan; 2():5. PubMed ID: 17217547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of elapsed times from breast cancer detection to first adjuvant therapy in Nova Scotia in 1999/2000 and 2003/04.
Rayson D; Saint-Jacques N; Younis T; Meadows J; Dewar R
CMAJ; 2007 Jan; 176(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 17261829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit.
Chivers K; Basnyat P; Taffinder N
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jul; 12(7):632-9. PubMed ID: 19486094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of the UK government's 2-week target on waiting times in women with breast cancer in southeast England.
Robinson D; Bell CM; Møller H; Basnett I
Br J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 89(3):492-6. PubMed ID: 12888818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Delays experienced by patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer.
Wheeler ; Wakefield ; Mortensen NJ; Kettlewell
Colorectal Dis; 1999 May; 1(3):174-6. PubMed ID: 23577767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Systematic review with meta-analysis of over 90 000 patients. Does fast-track review diagnose colorectal cancer earlier?
Mozdiak E; Weldeselassie Y; McFarlane M; Tabuso M; Widlak MM; Dunlop A; Tsertsvadze A; Arasaradnam RP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2019 Aug; 50(4):348-372. PubMed ID: 31286552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Lymphoma presenting as neck lumps: causes of waiting time target breaches and potential solutions.
Raja H; Pabla L; Wheatley H; Farr MR
J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Nov; 127(11):1111-5. PubMed ID: 24180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The impact of the two-week wait rule on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in a single UK institution.
Blick C; Bailey D; Haldar N; Bdesha A; Kelleher J; Muneer A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jan; 92(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 20056061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The 2-week wait referral system, etc.: flogging a dead horse?
Milewski PJ
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):858. PubMed ID: 17509045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Referrals into a dedicated British penile cancer centre and sources of possible delay.
Lucky MA; Rogers B; Parr NJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Dec; 85(7):527-30. PubMed ID: 19584061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Waiting times. Quick quick slow.
Jones R
Health Serv J; 2001 Oct; 111(5778):20-3. PubMed ID: 11695061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
