1779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16413443)
1. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study.
Ekman P; Möller H; Hedlund R
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15653083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of obesity on clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion.
Djurasovic M; Bratcher KR; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1789-92. PubMed ID: 18628712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety and efficacy of OP-1 (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft for posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis: minimum 4-year follow-up of a pilot study.
Vaccaro AR; Whang PG; Patel T; Phillips FM; Anderson DG; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Brower RS; Kurd MF; Appannagari A; Patel M; Fischgrund JS
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 17588821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?
Glassman SD; Schwab F; Bridwell KH; Shaffrey C; Horton W; Hu S
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 18774752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
Dewing CB; Provencher MT; Riffenburgh RH; Kerr S; Manos RE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome.
Anand N; Hamilton JF; Perri B; Miraliakbar H; Goldstein T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):E748-53. PubMed ID: 16985443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF/TLIF) for the treatment of localised segment degeneration of lumbar spine].
Kunze B; Drasseck T; Kluba T
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Jun; 149(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 21341184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
Sears W
Spine J; 2005; 5(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15749617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?
Gatchel RJ; Mayer TG
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 20362248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
