117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16413876)
1. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review.
Davey E; Barratt A; Irwig L; Chan SF; Macaskill P; Mannes P; Saville AM
Lancet; 2006 Jan; 367(9505):122-32. PubMed ID: 16413876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study.
Davey E; d'Assuncao J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; Richards A; Farnsworth A
BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology.
Boon ME; Rijkaart DC; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Korporaal H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Sep; 34(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 16900471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program.
Beerman H; van Dorst EB; Kuenen-Boumeester V; Hogendoorn PC
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Mar; 112(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 19150573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeating cytological preparations on liquid-based cytology samples: A methodological advantage?
Pinto AP; Maia HF; di Loretto C; Krunn P; Túlio S; Collaço LM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):663-9. PubMed ID: 17854084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid pre-screening is more sensitive in liquid-based cytology than in conventional smears.
Dudding N; Renshaw AA; Ellis K
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 21135523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FocalPoint slide classification algorithms show robust performance in classification of high-grade lesions on SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology slides.
Parker EM; Foti JA; Wilbur DC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 14755762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.
Crothers BA; Darragh TM; Tambouret RH; Nayar R; Barkan GA; Zhao C; Booth CN; Padmanabhan V; Tabatabai ZL; Souers RJ; Thomas N; Wilbur DC; Moriarty AT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 26046490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
