These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16414494)
1. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer. Klotz L Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 16414494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention using PSA doubling time for good risk prostate cancer. Klotz L Eur Urol; 2005 Jan; 47(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 15582244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom? Klotz L J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(32):8165-9. PubMed ID: 16278468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention: walking the line between overtreatment for indolent disease and undertreatment for aggressive disease. Klotz LH Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():53-7; discussion 101-2. PubMed ID: 15780167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention is the way to manage 'good-risk' prostate cancer. Klotz L Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):136-42; quiz 1 p following 149. PubMed ID: 16474710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer death of men treated with initial active surveillance: clinical and biochemical characteristics. Krakowsky Y; Loblaw A; Klotz L J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 20478589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer: clinical experience and a 'number needed to treat' analysis. Klotz LH; Nam RK Can J Urol; 2006 Feb; 13 Suppl 1():48-55. PubMed ID: 16526983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. Choo R; Klotz L; Danjoux C; Morton GC; DeBoer G; Szumacher E; Fleshner N; Bunting P; Hruby G J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1664-9. PubMed ID: 11912384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active surveillance; a reasonable management alternative for patients with prostate cancer: the Miami experience. Soloway MS; Soloway CT; Williams S; Ayyathurai R; Kava B; Manoharan M BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 17850361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early outcomes of active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. Hardie C; Parker C; Norman A; Eeles R; Horwich A; Huddart R; Dearnaley D BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):956-60. PubMed ID: 15839912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Management of prostate cancer with indolent biological potential: from watchful waiting to active surveillance]. Leibovici D; Lindner A; Stay K; Zisman A Harefuah; 2006 Oct; 145(10):763-7, 781, 780. PubMed ID: 17111715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Dall'Era MA; Konety BR; Cowan JE; Shinohara K; Stauf F; Cooperberg MR; Meng MV; Kane CJ; Perez N; Master VA; Carroll PR Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(12):2664-70. PubMed ID: 18433013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active surveillance for good risk prostate cancer: rationale, method, and results. Klotz LH Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():21-4. PubMed ID: 16018828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive factors for progression in patients with clinical stage T1a prostate cancer in the PSA era. Descazeaud A; Peyromaure M; Salin A; Amsellem-Ouazana D; Flam T; Viellefond A; Debré B; Zerbib M Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 17611015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy. Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence and follow-up of patients with focal prostate carcinoma in 2 screening rounds after an interval of 4 years. Postma R; de Vries SH; Roobol MJ; Wildhagen MF; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(4):708-16. PubMed ID: 15648082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer. Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era. Carter CA; Donahue T; Sun L; Wu H; McLeod DG; Amling C; Lance R; Foley J; Sexton W; Kusuda L; Chung A; Soderdahl D; Jackmaan S; Moul JW J Clin Oncol; 2003 Nov; 21(21):4001-8. PubMed ID: 14581423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Valiquette L; Perrotte P; Jeldres C; Briganti A; Gallina A; Suardi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Salonia A; Montorsi F Urology; 2009 May; 73(5):1087-91. PubMed ID: 19195695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]