These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1641574)

  • 1. Speech recognition in noise when wearing amplitude-sensitive ear-muffs.
    Arlinger S
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 1641574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection.
    Abel SM; Hay VH
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 8658023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound localization with hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Armstrong NM
    J Otolaryngol; 1993 Oct; 22(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 8283505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
    Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss.
    Abel SM; Armstrong NM; Giguère C
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 8322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
    Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in a noisy and reverberant environment with and without earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Audiology; 1990; 29(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 2275643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of low-pass filtered words in a noisy and reverberant environment with and without earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen E; Viljanen V; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2075414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Haythornthwaite C; Riko K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 7085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):297-311. PubMed ID: 6826899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of effective noise exposure of workers wearing ear-muffs.
    Kotarbińska E; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 19534852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of aging on the noise attenuation of ear-muffs.
    Kotarbinska E
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):39-45. PubMed ID: 16053604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Riko K
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 7001041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.