150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16415935)
1. [Patient satisfaction with two different types of bladder catheters].
Litherland AT; Aas MS; Schiøtz HA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16415935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-perceived discomfort with two coated urinary catheters.
Litherland AT; Schiøtz HA
Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 17505374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial.
De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters.
Stensballe J; Looms D; Nielsen PN; Tvede M
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 16126331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel product for intermittent catheterisation: its impact on compliance with daily life--international multicentre study.
Bjerklund Johansen T; Hultling C; Madersbacher H; Del Popolo G; Amarenco G;
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 17166653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Residual urine after intermittent catheterization in females using two different catheters.
Biering-Sørensen F; Hansen HV; Nielsen PN; Looms D
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 17763228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study of the degree of patient satisfaction in intermittent catheterization with Lofric and polyvinyl chloride catheters].
López Pereira P; Martínez Urrutia MJ; Lobato L; Rivas S; Jaureguizar Monereo E
Actas Urol Esp; 2001; 25(10):725-30. PubMed ID: 11803779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.
Schumm K; Lam TB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 18951451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization.
Taskinen S; Fagerholm R; Ruutu M
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Oct; 4(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 18790422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Diokno AC; Mitchell BA; Nash AJ; Kimbrough JA
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 7815580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter.
Sutherland RS; Kogan BA; Baskin LS; Mevorach RA
J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2041-3. PubMed ID: 8911385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of a new compact catheter for men with neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a randomised, crossover and open-labelled study.
Chartier-Kastler E; Lauge I; Ruffion A; Goossens D; Charvier K; Biering-Sørensen F
Spinal Cord; 2011 Jul; 49(7):844-50. PubMed ID: 21339763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials.
Witjes JA; Del Popolo G; Marberger M; Jonsson O; Kaps HP; Chapple CR
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2794-8. PubMed ID: 19837425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard versus hydrophilic catheterization in the adjuvant treatment of patients with superficial bladder cancer.
Cindolo L; Palmieri EA; Autorino R; Salzano L; Altieri V
Urol Int; 2004; 73(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 15263787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of two coated catheters in intermittent self-catheterization.
Pascoe G; Clovis S
Br J Nurs; 2001 Mar 8-21; 10(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 12170675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.
Johansson K; Greis G; Johansson B; Grundtmann A; Pahlby Y; Törn S; Axelberg H; Carlsson P
Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 22762536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parent and child experiences using a hydrophilic or reused PVC catheter for intermittent catheterisation.
Chick HE; Hunter KF; Moore KN
J Clin Nurs; 2013 Feb; 22(3-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 22827882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy.
Krane LS; Bhandari M; Peabody JO; Menon M
Eur Urol; 2009 Aug; 56(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 19394131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
