555 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16416403)
21. Bayesian inference for stochastic kinetic models using a diffusion approximation.
Golightly A; Wilkinson DJ
Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 16135029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Semi-parametric modelling for costs of health care technologies.
Conigliani C; Tancredi A
Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3171-84. PubMed ID: 15568210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The utility of prior information and stratification for parameter estimation with two screening tests but no gold standard.
Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1203-17. PubMed ID: 15558709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nonparametric Bayesian estimation of the three-way receiver operating characteristic surface.
Inácio V; Turkman AA; Nakas CT; Alonzo TA
Biom J; 2011 Nov; 53(6):1011-24. PubMed ID: 22069202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Practical Bayesian inference using mixtures of mixtures.
Cao G; West M
Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1334-41. PubMed ID: 8962457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bayesian inference for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew-normal and skew-t distributions.
Frühwirth-Schnatter S; Pyne S
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):317-36. PubMed ID: 20110247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fully Bayesian estimation of Gibbs hyperparameters for emission computed tomography data.
Higdon DM; Bowsher JE; Johnson VE; Turkington TG; Gilland DR; Jaszczak RJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 9368107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robust Bayesian prediction of subject disease status and population prevalence using several similar diagnostic tests.
Evans RB; Erlandson K
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2227-36. PubMed ID: 15236427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
Hossain S; Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-parametric Bayesian approach to hazard regression: a case study with a large number of missing covariate values.
Arjas E; Liu L
Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1757-70. PubMed ID: 8870158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of diagnostic markers by goodness-of-fit tests.
Nakas C; Yiannoutsos CT; Bosch RJ; Moyssiadis C
Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2503-13. PubMed ID: 12872305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bayesian image reconstruction for improving detection performance of muon tomography.
Wang G; Schultz LJ; Qi J
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 May; 18(5):1080-9. PubMed ID: 19342340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving Cox survival analysis with a neural-Bayesian approach.
Bakker B; Heskes T; Neijt J; Kappen B
Stat Med; 2004 Oct; 23(19):2989-3012. PubMed ID: 15351957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Bayesian approach to parameter estimation in HIV dynamical models.
Putter H; Heisterkamp SH; Lange JM; de Wolf F
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2199-214. PubMed ID: 12210633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Empirical significance values for linkage analysis: trait simulation using posterior model distributions from MCMC oligogenic segregation analysis.
Igo RP; Wijsman EM
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 17849492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
