These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16416609)

  • 1. The undesirable influence of reconstructive procedures on the symmetry of the nasolabial folds.
    Cook JL
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Nov; 31(11 Pt 1):1409-16. PubMed ID: 16416609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The cartilage anchor--a helpful tool for precise control of the nasolabial fold].
    Greulich M
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2010 Apr; 42(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 20352573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total facial rehabilitation: the evolving concept of reconstructive surgery.
    Clauser L; Curioni C
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 May; 8(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 9482066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propeller facial artery perforator flap as first reconstructive option for nasolabial and perinasal complex defects.
    Ruiz-Moya A; Lagares-Borrego A; Infante-Cossío P
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Apr; 68(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 25704730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tunneled and transposed island flaps in facial reconstructive surgery.
    Cook JL
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Sep; 40 Suppl 9():S16-29. PubMed ID: 25158873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nasolabial symmetry and esthetics in cleft lip and palate: analysis of 3D facial images.
    Desmedt DJ; Maal TJ; Kuijpers MA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Fudalej PS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Nov; 19(8):1833-42. PubMed ID: 25802221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry in preschool patients with orofacial clefts after neonatal cheiloplasty.
    Moslerová V; Dadáková M; Dupej J; Hoffmannova E; Borský J; Černý M; Bejda P; Kočandrlová K; Velemínská J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():40-45. PubMed ID: 29605363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetry in nasolabial area of UCCL patients one year after primary lip repair with modified Millard technique.
    Zhang R; Li J; Zheng Q; Shi B; Li S; Wang Y; He X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S11-8. PubMed ID: 23083949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. THE NASOLABIAL FLAP: THE MOST VERSATILE METHOD IN FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION.
    Bayer J; Schwarzmannová K; Dušková M; Novotná K; Kníže J; Sukop A
    Acta Chir Plast; 2018; 59(3-4):135-141. PubMed ID: 29651854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New method to evaluate sequelae of static facial asymmetry in patients with facial palsy using three-dimensional scanning analysis.
    Azuma T; Fuchigami T; Nakamura K; Kondo E; Sato G; Kitamura Y; Takeda N
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2022 Oct; 49(5):755-761. PubMed ID: 35105501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols.
    Fudalej P; Katsaros C; Bongaarts C; Dudkiewicz Z; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1661-6. PubMed ID: 19615579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fat transfer: current use in practice.
    Ellenbogen R
    Clin Plast Surg; 2000 Oct; 27(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 11039888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of facial deformities in leprosy patients.
    Banerjee S
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2004 Dec; 102(12):700-1. PubMed ID: 15871355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Esthetics of the Nasolabial Fold and Age in the Elderly Via Eye-Tracking.
    Tanaka OM; Cavassin LD; Gasparello GG; Meira TM; Miyoshi CS; Hartmann GC
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2023; 14(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 37249988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The subcutaneous fat compartments in relation to aesthetically important facial folds and rhytides.
    Gierloff M; Stöhring C; Buder T; Wiltfang J
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1292-7. PubMed ID: 22658728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using three-dimensional average facial meshes to determine nasolabial soft tissue deformity in adult UCLP patients.
    Wong KWF; Keeling A; Achal K; Khambay B
    Surgeon; 2019 Feb; 17(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 29880431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstruction of the midface and maxilla.
    O'Connell DA; Futran ND
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 18(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 20543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images.
    Schwirtz RMF; Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; Tan RA; Maal TJ; Prahl C; de Vet HCW; Don Griot JPW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):747-752. PubMed ID: 29350971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Esthetic reconstructive surgery of the face. Introduction].
    Darsonval V
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2013 Oct; 58(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 24074697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.