BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16417696)

  • 1. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
    Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for cervical disease in mature women: strategies for improvement.
    Colgan TJ; Clarke A; Hakh N; Seidenfeld A
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 96(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 12209660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
    Silfverdal L; Kemetli L; Andrae B; Sparén P; Ryd W; Dillner J; Strander B; Törnberg S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk factors for cervical neoplasia in Denmark.
    Kjaer SK
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 80():1-41. PubMed ID: 9693662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical/transformation zone sample.
    Zhao C; Austin RM
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 18484643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervix cancer screening in Croatia within the European Cervical Cancer Prevention Week.
    Skopljanac-Macina L; Mahovlić V; Ovanin-Rakić A; Barisić A; Rajhvajn S; Juric D; Babić D; Corusić A; Oresković S
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Jun; 34(2):613-7. PubMed ID: 20698138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory performance measures: evidence against low-risk women explaining low detection rates of high-grade abnormalities.
    Mitchell HS
    Cytopathology; 2005 Apr; 16(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 15787649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors predicting the persistence of genital human papillomavirus infections and PAP smear abnormality in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women during prospective follow-up.
    Branca M; Garbuglia AR; Benedetto A; Cappiello T; Leoncini L; Migliore G; Agarossi A; Syrjänen K;
    Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Jun; 14(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 12816671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
    Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cytology in vulnerable pregnant women.
    Loomis DM; Pastore PA; Rejman K; Gutierrez KL; Bethea B
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 May; 21(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 19432913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of adding human papilloma virus testing to a managed care cervical cancer screening program.
    Lonky NM; Hunter MI; Sadeghi M; Edwards G; Bajamundi K; Monk BJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2007 Oct; 11(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 17917570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pap smear screening in a health maintenance organization: 1986-1990.
    Rolnick S; LaFerla JJ; Wehrle D; Trygstad E; Okagaki T
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 8860280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.