These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16417829)

  • 1. Clinical color match of porcelain visual shade-matching systems.
    Wee AG; Kang EY; Jere D; Beck FM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):351-7; discussion 358. PubMed ID: 16417829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating porcelain color match of different porcelain shade-matching systems.
    Wee AG; Kang EY; Johnston WM; Seghi RR
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):271-80. PubMed ID: 11338494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain.
    Wee AG; Monaghan P; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12131889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an optimized shade guide made from porcelain powder mixtures.
    Wang P; Wei J; Li Q; Wang Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1553-8. PubMed ID: 25134994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a custom dental porcelain shade system for computer color matching.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Wang J; Seliger A; Lin J; Da Silva J
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e3-e10. PubMed ID: 23380276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides.
    Hammad IA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12589286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.
    Oh WS; Koh IW; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2009; 40(10):833-6. PubMed ID: 19898714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Color measurements as quality criteria for clinical shade matching of porcelain crowns.
    Dancy WK; Yaman P; Dennison JB; O'Brien WJ; Razzoog ME
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(2):114-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 12762475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches.
    Douglas RD; Przybylska M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 10424975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison.
    Paul SJ; Peter A; Rodoni L; Pietrobon N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 15227770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of porcelain color reproduction by commercial laboratories.
    Douglas RD; Brewer JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 14564288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
    Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the accuracy of computer color matching with a new dental porcelain shade system.
    Wang J; Lin J; Gil M; Seliger A; Da Silva JD; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 24286638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color match to VITA classical shade guide of four different veneering porcelain systems for metal ceramic restorations.
    Fazi G; Vichi A; Corciolani G; Ferrari M
    Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 19281108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.