123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16418504)
1. Human papillomavirus triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: cost-effective, but at what cost?
Melnikow J; Birch S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 16418504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of alternative triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
JAMA; 2002 May; 287(18):2382-90. PubMed ID: 11988059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colposcopy for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions found on Papanicolaou smear.
Reed BD
Arch Fam Med; 1996; 5(10):582-4. PubMed ID: 8930230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.
Kim JJ; Wright TC; Goldie SJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(12):888-95. PubMed ID: 15956650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost and effectiveness comparison of immediate colposcopy versus human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Turkish women.
Kececioglu M; Seckin B; Baser E; Togrul C; Kececioglu TS; Cicek MN; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(1):511-4. PubMed ID: 23534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. HPV DNA testing in the triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): cost comparison of two methods.
Layfield LJ; Qureshi MN
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 16007672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
Felix JC; Lacey MJ; Miller JD; Lenhart GM; Spitzer M; Kulkarni R
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jun; 25(6):606-16. PubMed ID: 27023044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's triage and management preferences for cervical cytologic reports demonstrating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Ferris DG; Kriegel D; Cote L; Litaker M; Woodward L
Arch Fam Med; 1997; 6(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 9225706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study.
Guido R; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Burke L;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1401-5. PubMed ID: 12824969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs of detection and treatment of cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia and genital warts in the UK.
Brown RE; Breugelmans JG; Theodoratou D; Bénard S
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Apr; 22(4):663-70. PubMed ID: 16684427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic analysis of human papillomavirus triage, repeat cytology, and immediate colposcopy in management of women with minor cytological abnormalities in Sweden.
Ostensson E; Fröberg M; Hjerpe A; Zethraeus N; Andersson S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1316-25. PubMed ID: 20846064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial.
Solomon D; Schiffman M; Tarone R;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Feb; 93(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 11181776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cost-benefit analysis of colposcopy for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions found on Papanicolaou smear.
Chesebro MJ; Everett WD
Arch Fam Med; 1996; 5(10):576-81. PubMed ID: 8930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of new technologies in cervical cancer screening: results of the recruitment phase of a large randomised controlled trial from a public health perspective.
Giorgi-Rossi P; Segnan N; Zappa M; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Confortini M; Merito M; Cuzick J; Ronco G;
Int J Cancer; 2007 Dec; 121(12):2729-34. PubMed ID: 17724715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.
Pista A; Costa C; Saldanha C; Moutinho JAF; Moutinho JM; Arrobas F; Catalão C; Kempers J
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):235. PubMed ID: 30808324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing to deal with atypical squamous cells undetermined significance and low squamous intraepithelial lesion].
Guo YL; You K; Geng L; Zhang XW; Shen XY; Yao YJ; Fan XH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Oct; 38(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 17068618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
