These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16418850)

  • 21. Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?
    Nicholls ME; Hughes G; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 154(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 14685803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies.
    Niemeier M; Stojanoski B; Singh VW; Chu E
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jun; 67(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 18243459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Gradkowski A; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 18982320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness.
    Manly T; Dobler VB; Dodds CM; George MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(12):1721-8. PubMed ID: 16154447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How does reading direction modulate perceptual asymmetry effects?
    Chung HK; Liu JY; Hsiao JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1559-1574. PubMed ID: 27223256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects.
    Grewal P; Viswanathan J; Barton JJ; Lanyon LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.
    Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM
    Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.
    Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of time-on-task and concurrent cognitive load on normal visuospatial bias.
    Dodds CM; van Belle J; Peers PV; Dove A; Cusack R; Duncan J; Manly T
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Jul; 22(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 18590365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.
    Dufour A; Touzalin P; Candas V
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(3):532-7. PubMed ID: 17146643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.