These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16419819)

  • 1. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans.
    Müller J; Janssen T; Heppelmann G; Wagner W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3747-56. PubMed ID: 16419819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Deeter R; Abel R; Calandruccio L; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Abdala C; Mishra SK; Williams TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1584-94. PubMed ID: 19275316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
    Wagner W; Heyd A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
    Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Mishra SK; Abdala C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 25320951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: input-output functions in neonates.
    Campos Ude P; Hatzopoulos S; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H; Carvallo RM
    Med Sci Monit; 2011 Oct; 17(10):CR557-62. PubMed ID: 21959609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.
    Henin S; Thompson S; Abdelrazeq S; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.