147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16419928)
1. The NHS needs innovation, not patient care on-the-cheap.
Wilkinson J
Med Device Technol; 2005 Dec; 16(10):43. PubMed ID: 16419928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical device uptake challenged.
Rayfield J
Health Estate; 2005 Feb; 59(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 15730001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Healthcare technology co-operatives: Innovative about innovation.
Heron NM; Tindale WB
J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):378-81. PubMed ID: 26453035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical device evaluation in the United Kingdom: past, present and future.
Crawford DC
J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):108-11. PubMed ID: 16019879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First U.S.-Russian business venture in closed nuclear city.
Lopatto J; Wilkes B
Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):212-3. PubMed ID: 14744060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Switzerland's medical technology potential.
Med Device Technol; 2004 Mar; 15(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 15154339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Netherlands innovation utilising.
Med Device Technol; 2008 Sep; 19(5):58-9. PubMed ID: 18947153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Task force recommendations to transform UK industry.
Wilkinson J
Med Device Technol; 2004 Dec; 15(10):36-7. PubMed ID: 16225284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A dynamic industry where innovation is a priority.
Med Device Technol; 2005 Oct; 16(8):38-42. PubMed ID: 16355971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefits of biotech clusters questioned.
Sheridan C
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1258-9. PubMed ID: 14595343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The price of growth in the medical-device industry.
Garber AM
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 16870911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding the clinician to medical device innovation.
Egan J
Med Device Technol; 2006 Oct; 17(8):29-31. PubMed ID: 17153370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing research capacity and capability - how can national infrastructure help?
McGrath JS; Scholefield J; Gower J; Pickard R
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):370-1. PubMed ID: 23253901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The industry in Europe: more together than apart.
Med Device Technol; 2005 Nov; 16(9):32, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 16438447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotech parks proliferate, despite concerns over sustainability.
Jia H; Jayaraman KS; Orellana C
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1259-60. PubMed ID: 14595344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes research affecting devices.
Wagner M
Mod Healthc; 1991 Feb; 21(6):54. PubMed ID: 10109044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mirandola: land of innovation.
Galavotti P
Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):34-6. PubMed ID: 11547686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Strength in diversity.
Med Device Technol; 1999 Mar; 10(2):80. PubMed ID: 10387616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.
Goodman CS; Gelijns AC
Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():267-315. PubMed ID: 11066263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Partnering with your suppliers. A lesson from industry.
Ziehr J
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1992 Aug; 10(7):42-6. PubMed ID: 10119550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
