These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1642041)

  • 21. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sodium fluoride sustained-release bone cement: an experimental study in vitro and in vivo.
    Magnan B; Gabbi C; Regis D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1994; 60(1):72-9; discussion 80. PubMed ID: 8171990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Initial stability of an implanted cement-canal prosthesis. Results in experimental studies on human cadaver femurs].
    Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Sailer FP
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 8212817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms.
    Topoleski LD; Ducheyne P; Cuckler JM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Feb; 24(2):135-54. PubMed ID: 2329111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fatigue properties and stem subsidence in wire coil reinforced PMMA bone cement: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1996; 6(6):453-62. PubMed ID: 9138655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Histological and biomechanical study of impacted cancellous allografts with cement in the femur: a canine model.
    Omoto O; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Deie M; Ochi M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1357-64. PubMed ID: 18758792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Blood lamination in bone cement--effect of cementing technique].
    Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Ishida A
    Unfallchirurg; 1993 Jul; 96(7):390-4. PubMed ID: 8367735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
    MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Mechanical bending strength of explanted ex vivo bone cements compared with in vitro samples].
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Maus U; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 18324590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of the bioactive bone cement--bone interface: quantitative and histological evaluation.
    Nishimura N; Taguchi Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10148343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures.
    Hungerford DS; Jones LC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):12-24. PubMed ID: 3416519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Histological findings of the femoral bone after cement removal in hip revision. An experimental study of cadaver femurs with two different cement removal procedures.
    Porsch M; Schmidt J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12743715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cement viscosity affects the bone-cement interface in total hip arthroplasty.
    Stone JJ; Rand JA; Chiu EK; Grabowski JJ; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):834-7. PubMed ID: 8893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hydroxyapatite impregnated bone cement: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Kwon SY; Kim YS; Woo YK; Kim SS; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 9262826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of high-energy shock waves for bone cement removal.
    May TC; Krause WR; Preslar AJ; Smith MJ; Beaudoin AJ; Cardea JA
    J Arthroplasty; 1990 Mar; 5(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 2319244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.