BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16420535)

  • 1. Measurement of the mechanical properties of the skin using the suction test.
    Khatyr F; Imberdis C; Varchon D; Lagarde JM; Josse G
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16420535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A nonlinear elastic behavior to identify the mechanical parameters of human skin in vivo.
    Delalleau A; Josse G; Lagarde JM; Zahouani H; Bergheau JM
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 18412557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy.
    Khatyr F; Imberdis C; Vescovo P; Varchon D; Lagarde JM
    Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 15059176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests.
    Pailler-Mattei C; Bec S; Zahouani H
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jun; 30(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 17869160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation.
    Chevalier Y; Pahr D; Allmer H; Charlebois M; Zysset P
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3333-40. PubMed ID: 17572433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cupping: from a biomechanical perspective.
    Tham LM; Lee HP; Lu C
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2183-93. PubMed ID: 16126216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Apparent Young's modulus of human radius using inverse finite-element method.
    Bosisio MR; Talmant M; Skalli W; Laugier P; Mitton D
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2022-8. PubMed ID: 17097663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical characterization of anisotropic planar biological soft tissues using large indentation: a computational feasibility study.
    Cox MA; Driessen NJ; Bouten CV; Baaijens FP
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):428-36. PubMed ID: 16706592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo mechanical properties of thoracic aortic aneurysmal wall estimated from in vitro biaxial tensile test.
    Fukui T; Matsumoto T; Tanaka T; Ohashi T; Kumagai K; Akimoto H; Tabayashi K; Sato M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 16010038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vivo study of the mechanical properties of facial skin and influence of aging using digital image speckle correlation.
    Staloff IA; Guan E; Katz S; Rafailovitch M; Sokolov A; Sokolov S
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18412553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of cell Young's modulus of adherent cells probed by optical and magnetic tweezers: influence of cell thickness and bead immersion.
    KamgouƩ A; Ohayon J; Tracqui P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Aug; 129(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 17655473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element simulations of the mechanical response of the fingertip to static and dynamic compressions.
    Wu JZ; Welcome DE; Dong RG
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16880157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of the mechanical properties of a dermal equivalent compared with human skin in vivo by indentation and static friction tests.
    Zahouani H; Pailler-Mattei C; Sohm B; Vargiolu R; Cenizo V; Debret R
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 19152581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric finite element analysis of physical stimuli resulting from mechanical stimulation of tissue engineered cartilage.
    Babalola OM; Bonassar LJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061014. PubMed ID: 19449968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours.
    Samani A; Plewes D
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1247-60. PubMed ID: 17301452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver.
    Nava A; Mazza E; Furrer M; Villiger P; Reinhart WH
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Apr; 12(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18171633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous determination of the nonlinear-elastic properties of skin and subcutaneous tissue in unconfined compression tests.
    Wu JZ; Cutlip RG; Andrew ME; Dong RG
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 17250530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A structural fingertip model for simulating of the biomechanics of tactile sensation.
    Wu JZ; Dong RG; Rakheja S; Schopper AW; Smutz WP
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15036184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of enhanced continuum FE with micro FE models of human vertebral bodies.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    J Biomech; 2009 Mar; 42(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 19155014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.