161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16420865)
1. [Polypropylene and polydioxanone show similar biomechanical efficacy in midline closure].
Bellón JM; Rodríguez M; Serrano N; García-Honduvilla N; Gómez V; Buján J
Cir Esp; 2005 Dec; 78(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 16420865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New suture materials for midline laparotomy closure: an experimental study.
Bellón JM; Pérez-López P; Simón-Allue R; Sotomayor S; Pérez-Köhler B; Peña E; Pascual G; Calvo B
BMC Surg; 2014 Sep; 14():70. PubMed ID: 25231161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.
Hsiao WC; Young KC; Wang ST; Lin PW
World J Surg; 2000 Jun; 24(6):747-51; discussion 752. PubMed ID: 10773130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short- and long-term biomechanical and morphological study of new suture types in abdominal wall closure.
Simón-Allué R; Pérez-López P; Sotomayor S; Peña E; Pascual G; Bellón JM; Calvo B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Sep; 37():1-11. PubMed ID: 24859461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of polyglactin-910 and polydioxanone for closure of the linea alba following caudal ventral midline laparotomy in sheep.
Rousseau M; Anderson DE; Rozell TG; Hand JM; Faris BR
Can Vet J; 2015 Sep; 56(9):959-63. PubMed ID: 26345301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strength of small-bites abdominal wall closure using different suturing methods and materials in an experimental animal model.
Allaeys M; Visscher L; den Hartog FPJ; Dries P; Tanis PJ; Theeuwes HP; Berrevoet F; Eker HH
Hernia; 2024 Apr; 28(2):527-535. PubMed ID: 38212505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies].
Bresler L; Courbey PJ; Feldman L; Bilweiss J; Tortuyaux JM; Rauch P; Boissel P; Grosdidier J
Ann Chir; 1995; 49(6):544-8. PubMed ID: 8526449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.
Krukowski ZH; Cusick EL; Engeset J; Matheson NA
Br J Surg; 1987 Sep; 74(9):828-30. PubMed ID: 3117165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midline abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept.
Bellón JM; López-Hervás P; Rodríguez M; García-Honduvilla N; Pascual G; Buján J
J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 17000392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the breaking strength and stiffness of polydioxanone (sizes 2, 7) and polyglactin 910 (sizes 3, 6) in the equine linea alba.
Fierheller EE; Wilson DG
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15720592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Suturable mesh better resists early laparotomy failure in a cyclic ball-burst model.
Scheiber CJ; Kurapaty SS; Goldman SM; Dearth CL; Liacouras PC; Souza JM
Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):559-565. PubMed ID: 32040788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polydioxanone Versus Polypropylene Closure For Midline Abdominal Incisions.
Naz S; Memon SA; Jamali MA; Ahmed MR; Almani T
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2017; 29(4):591-594. PubMed ID: 29330984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Synthetic polyglycomer short-term absorbable sutures vs. polydioxanone long-term absorbable sutures for preventing incisional hernia and wound dehiscence after abdominal wall closure: a comparative randomized study of patients treated for gastric or colon cancer.
Ohira G; Kawahira H; Miyauchi H; Suzuki K; Nishimori T; Hanari N; Mori M; Tohma T; Gunji H; Horibe D; Narushima K; Matsubara H
Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 25556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).
Seiler CM; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Papyan A; Golcher H; Seidlmayer C; Franck A; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 19300233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between barbed and nonbarbed absorbable suture for fascial closure in a porcine model.
Oni G; Brown SA; Kenkel JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):535e-540e. PubMed ID: 23018714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of incisional bursting strength of a bidirectional absorbable knotless suture material versus a standard continuous absorbable suture material for closure of the equine linea alba.
Bellitto NA; Oliver FB; Pollock PJ
Vet Surg; 2023 Nov; 52(8):1121-1127. PubMed ID: 37655506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia.
O'Dwyer PJ; Courtney CA
Surgeon; 2003 Feb; 1(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 15568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
