These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16421416)

  • 1. Assessing BRCA carrier probabilities in extended families.
    Barcenas CH; Hosain GM; Arun B; Zong J; Zhou X; Chen J; Cortada JM; Mills GB; Tomlinson GE; Miller AR; Strong LC; Amos CI
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jan; 24(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 16421416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BOADICEA and BRCAPRO models and penetrance estimation in high-risk French-Canadian families.
    Antoniou AC; Durocher F; Smith P; Simard J; Easton DF;
    Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(1):R3. PubMed ID: 16417652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the performance of models for predicting the BRCA germline mutations in Han Chinese familial breast cancer patients.
    Rao NY; Hu Z; Yu JM; Li WF; Zhang B; Su FX; Wu J; Shen ZZ; Huang W; Shao ZM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):563-70. PubMed ID: 18807178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier prediction models in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of French Canadian descent.
    Oros KK; Ghadirian P; Maugard CM; Perret C; Paredes Y; Mes-Masson AM; Foulkes WD; Provencher D; Tonin PN
    Clin Genet; 2006 Oct; 70(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 16965326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the pedigree assessment tool (PAT) in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
    Teller P; Hoskins KF; Zwaagstra A; Stanislaw C; Iyengar R; Green VL; Gabram SG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):240-6. PubMed ID: 19763692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods.
    James PA; Doherty R; Harris M; Mukesh BN; Milner A; Young MA; Scott C
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 24(4):707-15. PubMed ID: 16446345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction models in male breast cancer patients.
    Moghadasi S; Grundeken V; Janssen LAM; Dijkstra NH; Rodríguez-Girondo M; van Zelst-Stams WAG; Oosterwijk JC; Ausems MGEM; Oldenburg RA; Adank MA; Blom EW; Ruijs MWG; van Os TAM; van Deurzen CHM; Martens JWM; Schroder CP; Wijnen JT; Vreeswijk MPG; van Asperen CJ
    Clin Genet; 2018 Jan; 93(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 28589637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    Berry DA; Iversen ES; Gudbjartsson DF; Hiller EH; Garber JE; Peshkin BN; Lerman C; Watson P; Lynch HT; Hilsenbeck SG; Rubinstein WS; Hughes KS; Parmigiani G
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jun; 20(11):2701-12. PubMed ID: 12039933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the performance of the breast cancer genetic risk models BOADICEA, IBIS, BRCAPRO and Claus for predicting BRCA1/2 mutation carrier probabilities: a study based on 7352 families from the German Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Consortium.
    Fischer C; Kuchenbäcker K; Engel C; Zachariae S; Rhiem K; Meindl A; Rahner N; Dikow N; Plendl H; Debatin I; Grimm T; Gadzicki D; Flöttmann R; Horvath J; Schröck E; Stock F; Schäfer D; Schwaab I; Kartsonaki C; Mavaddat N; Schlegelberger B; Antoniou AC; Schmutzler R;
    J Med Genet; 2013 Jun; 50(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 23564750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.
    Antoniou AC; Hardy R; Walker L; Evans DG; Shenton A; Eeles R; Shanley S; Pichert G; Izatt L; Rose S; Douglas F; Eccles D; Morrison PJ; Scott J; Zimmern RL; Easton DF; Pharoah PD
    J Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 45(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 18413374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: validation of the novel country-customized IC software.
    Capalbo C; Ricevuto E; Vestri A; Sidoni T; Buffone A; Cortesi E; Marchetti P; Scambia G; Tomao S; Rinaldi C; Zani M; Ferraro S; Frati L; Screpanti I; Gulino A; Giannini G
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 14(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 16288312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing in Hispanic patients: mutation prevalence and evaluation of the BRCAPRO risk assessment model.
    Vogel KJ; Atchley DP; Erlichman J; Broglio KR; Ready KJ; Valero V; Amos CI; Hortobagyi GN; Lu KH; Arun B
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 25(29):4635-41. PubMed ID: 17925560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting a BRCA risk assessment model for use in a familial cancer clinic.
    Panchal SM; Ennis M; Canon S; Bordeleau LJ
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Dec; 9():116. PubMed ID: 19102775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of BOADICEA and BRCAPRO genetic models and of empirical criteria based on cancer family history for predicting BRCA mutation carrier probabilities: a retrospective study in a sample of Italian cancer genetics clinics.
    Varesco L; Viassolo V; Viel A; Gismondi V; Radice P; Montagna M; Alducci E; Della Puppa L; Oliani C; Tommasi S; Caligo MA; Vivanet C; Zuradelli M; Mandich P; Tibiletti MG; Cavalli P; Lucci Cordisco E; Turchetti D; Boggiani D; Bracci R; Bruzzi P; Bonelli L
    Breast; 2013 Dec; 22(6):1130-5. PubMed ID: 24011770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.
    Hung FH; Wang YA; Jian JW; Peng HP; Hsieh LL; Hung CF; Yang MM; Yang AS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10229. PubMed ID: 31308460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segregation analysis of 231 Ashkenazi Jewish families for evidence of additional breast cancer susceptibility genes.
    Kaufman DJ; Beaty TH; Struewing JP
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Oct; 12(10):1045-52. PubMed ID: 14578141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal selection for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing using a combination of 'easy to apply' probability models.
    Bodmer D; Ligtenberg MJ; van der Hout AH; Gloudemans S; Ansink K; Oosterwijk JC; Hoogerbrugge N
    Br J Cancer; 2006 Sep; 95(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 16909138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO.
    Euhus DM; Smith KC; Robinson L; Stucky A; Olopade OI; Cummings S; Garber JE; Chittenden A; Mills GB; Rieger P; Esserman L; Crawford B; Hughes KS; Roche CA; Ganz PA; Seldon J; Fabian CJ; Klemp J; Tomlinson G
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):844-51. PubMed ID: 12048272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a tool for identifying women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer in population-based screening.
    Hoskins KF; Zwaagstra A; Ranz M
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 107(8):1769-76. PubMed ID: 16967460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of mathematical models for breast cancer risk assessment in routine clinical use.
    Fasching PA; Bani MR; Nestle-Krämling C; Goecke TO; Niederacher D; Beckmann MW; Lux MP
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 17415092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.