These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16421501)

  • 1. Monte Carlo-based lung cancer treatment planning incorporating PET-defined target volumes.
    Chetty IJ; Fernando S; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Brooks C; Ten Haken RK; Kong FM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):65-76. PubMed ID: 16421501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.
    Nestle U; Kremp S; Schaefer-Schuler A; Sebastian-Welsch C; Hellwig D; Rübe C; Kirsch CM
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1342-8. PubMed ID: 16085592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accounting for center-of-mass target motion using convolution methods in Monte Carlo-based dose calculations of the lung.
    Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Balter JM; Ten Haken RK
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):925-32. PubMed ID: 15125011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of breathing motion versus heterogeneity effects in lung cancer treatment planning.
    Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Tatro DS; Ten Haken RK
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1462-73. PubMed ID: 17500477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generating lung tumor internal target volumes from 4D-PET maximum intensity projections.
    Lamb JM; Robinson C; Bradley J; Laforest R; Dehdashti F; White BM; Wuenschel S; Low DA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5732-7. PubMed ID: 21992387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using FDG-PET activity as a surrogate for tumor cell density and its effect on equivalent uniform dose calculation.
    Zhou SM; Wong TZ; Marks LB
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2577-83. PubMed ID: 15487740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for deriving a 4D-interpolated balanced planning target for mobile tumor radiotherapy.
    Roland T; Hales R; McNutt T; Wong J; Simari P; Tryggestad E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 22225288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional lung avoidance and response-adaptive escalation (FLARE) RT: Multimodality plan dosimetry of a precision radiation oncology strategy.
    Lee E; Zeng J; Miyaoka RS; Saini J; Kinahan PE; Sandison GA; Wong T; Vesselle HJ; Rengan R; Bowen SR
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3418-3429. PubMed ID: 28453861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes.
    Ford EC; Kinahan PE; Hanlon L; Alessio A; Rajendran J; Schwartz DL; Phillips M
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4280-8. PubMed ID: 17153406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reconstruction in deforming lung anatomy: dose grid size effects and clinical implications.
    Rosu M; Chetty IJ; Balter JM; Kessler ML; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2487-95. PubMed ID: 16193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation.
    Grills IS; Yan D; Martinez AA; Vicini FA; Wong JW; Kestin LL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):875-90. PubMed ID: 14529795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?
    Biehl KJ; Kong FM; Dehdashti F; Jin JY; Mutic S; El Naqa I; Siegel BA; Bradley JD
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1808-12. PubMed ID: 17079814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereotactic, single-dose irradiation of lung tumors: a comparison of absolute dose and dose distribution between pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms based on actual patient CT scans.
    Chen H; Lohr F; Fritz P; Wenz F; Dobler B; Lorenz F; Mühlnickel W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):955-63. PubMed ID: 20171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for better target volume definition in radiation therapy planning.
    Vila A; Sánchez-Reyes A; Conill C; Gispert JD; Trampal C; Láinez C; Vayreda J; Pedro A
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2010 May; 12(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 20466621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of planned dose on different CT image sets to four-dimensional Monte Carlo dose recalculation using the patient's actual breathing trace for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.
    Freislederer P; von Münchow A; Kamp F; Heinz C; Gerum S; Corradini S; Söhn M; Reiner M; Roeder F; Floca R; Alber M; Belka C; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3268-3277. PubMed ID: 31074510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning.
    Hong R; Halama J; Bova D; Sethi A; Emami B
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 17293230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue heterogeneities corrections in the treatment of head and neck cancer patients using stereotactic radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; McClinton C; Sood S; Badkul R; Saleh H; Jiang H; Lominska C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 27074489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
    Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.