408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16421528)
1. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should journals police scientific fraud?
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bureaucracy won't change the character of a cheat.
Bentley P
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):782-4. PubMed ID: 16482126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sitting in judgement.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
Slade E; Tamber PS
Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Responsiveness in the review of scientific articles for publication].
Ventura AG
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):573; author reply 573. PubMed ID: 19820805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Standardization of reviews of scientific publications].
Ventura AG
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):574-5; author reply 575. PubMed ID: 19839127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research.
Bhandari S
Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
