169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16422410)
21. Contrast agent response to chirp reversal: simulations, optical observations, and acoustical verification.
Novell A; van der Meer S; Versluis M; de Jong N; Bouakaz A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 19574127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Insonation of targeted microbubbles produces regions of reduced blood flow within tumor vasculature.
Hu X; Kheirolomoom A; Mahakian LM; Beegle JR; Kruse DE; Lam KS; Ferrara KW
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jul; 47(7):398-405. PubMed ID: 22659591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction.
Borden MA; Kruse DE; Caskey CF; Zhao S; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1992-2002. PubMed ID: 16422411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
Yeh CK; Su SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Kim H; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 15653236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optical and acoustical dynamics of microbubble contrast agents inside neutrophils.
Dayton PA; Chomas JE; Lum AF; Allen JS; Lindner JR; Simon SI; Ferrara KW
Biophys J; 2001 Mar; 80(3):1547-56. PubMed ID: 11222315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Ultrasound contrast agents--physical basics].
Kollmann C; Putzer M
Radiologe; 2005 Jun; 45(6):503-12. PubMed ID: 15809841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasound-driven microbubble oscillation and translation within small phantom vessels.
Zheng H; Dayton PA; Caskey C; Zhao S; Qin S; Ferrara KW
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1978-87. PubMed ID: 17900793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microbubble contrast agent detection using binary coded pulses.
Eckersley RJ; Tang MX; Chetty K; Hajnal JV
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1787-95. PubMed ID: 17629609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Focal areas of increased lipid concentration on the coating of microbubbles during short tone-burst ultrasound insonification.
Kooiman K; van Rooij T; Qin B; Mastik F; Vos HJ; Versluis M; Klibanov AL; de Jong N; Villanueva FS; Chen X
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180747. PubMed ID: 28686673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of acoustic transmit parameters on the destruction of contrast microbubbles in vitro.
Shi WT; Forsberg F; Vaidyanathan P; Tornes A; Østensen J; Goldberg BB
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4031-45. PubMed ID: 16885622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents.
Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 May; 38(5):846-63. PubMed ID: 22402024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.
Ammi AY; Cleveland RO; Mamou J; Wang GI; Bridal SL; O'Brien WD
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):126-36. PubMed ID: 16471439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High frequency attenuation measurements of lipid encapsulated contrast agents.
Goertz DE; Frijlink ME; Voormolen MM; de Jong N; van der Steen AF
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e131-4. PubMed ID: 16843511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optical microscopic findings of the behavior of perflubutane microbubbles outside and inside Kupffer cells during diagnostic ultrasound examination.
Liu GJ; Moriyasu F; Hirokawa T; Rexiati M; Yamada M; Imai Y
Invest Radiol; 2008 Dec; 43(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 19002054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Molecular Acoustic Angiography: A New Technique for High-resolution Superharmonic Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.
Shelton SE; Lindsey BD; Tsuruta JK; Foster FS; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):769-81. PubMed ID: 26678155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vivo characterization of ultrasound contrast agents: microbubble spectroscopy in a chicken embryo.
Faez T; Skachkov I; Versluis M; Kooiman K; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1608-17. PubMed ID: 22766113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Phase shift variance imaging - a new technique for destructive microbubble imaging.
Siepmann M; Fokong S; Mienkina M; Lederle W; Kiessling F; Gätjens J; Schmitz G
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 May; 60(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 23661125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microbubble destruction by dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation.
Yeh CK; Su SY; Shen CC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 May; 56(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 19473929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
