210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16422746)
1. Commentary on Defloor T & Grypdonck MFH (2005) Pressure ulcers: validation of two assessment scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 373-382.
Jackson P
J Clin Nurs; 2006 Feb; 15(2):240-1. PubMed ID: 16422746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work?
Anthony D; Papanikolaou P; Parboteeah S; Saleh M
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Nov; 19(4):132-6. PubMed ID: 20036124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure ulcers: prevention should make prediction a thing of the past.
Jones R
Br J Community Nurs; 2002 Dec; ():8; author reply 8. PubMed ID: 12553316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment scales--the missing link.
Olshansky K
Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(2):90. PubMed ID: 9729940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of three risk assessment scales.
Maylor M; Roberts A
Prof Nurse; 1999 Jun; 14(9):629-32. PubMed ID: 10427299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Validation of two scales for evaluation of the risk of decubitus ulcer: Gosnell and Nova-4].
García Fernández FP; Bermejo Cobo J; Pérez Catalán MJ; Ramírez Pérez C; Fernández Romo MA; Cano Luque MC; Luque Peña J; Cabrera Espinosa M; Pancorbo Hidalgo PL
Rev Enferm; 1999 Oct; 22(10):suppl 685-7. PubMed ID: 10745869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Assessing risk of decubitus ulcer using a current expert standard. Clinical assessment is the standard procedure].
Balzer K; Feuchtinger J; Tannen A; Kottner J
Pflege Z; 2011 Mar; 64(3):148-50, 152-3. PubMed ID: 21462464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical assessment of the decubitus ulcer risk. Identifying nursing expertise].
Balzer K
Pflege Z; 2012 Dec; 65(12):710-3. PubMed ID: 23330270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a pressure sore risk assessment scale.
Watkinson C
Prof Nurse; 1997 Feb; 12(5):341-6, 348. PubMed ID: 9128687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the Waterlow pressure ulcer risk-assessment tool.
Thompson D
Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):455-9. PubMed ID: 15924028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting pressure ulcer sore risk.
Ayello EA
Medsurg Nurs; 2003 Apr; 12(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 12736933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organisational perspective. A pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention audit: an RCN pilot.
Stephens F; Bick D
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2002 Jun; 9(3):24-9. PubMed ID: 12077868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability of risk-assessment scales.
Watkinson C
Prof Nurse; 1996 Aug; 11(11):751-2, 755-6. PubMed ID: 8718321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Waterlow assessment: not a predictor.
Waterlow JA
Br J Nurs; 2005 Jul 14-27; 14(13):689. PubMed ID: 16178097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing by numbers: we must use clinical judgement to assess risk.
Healey F
Nurs Times; 2010 Apr 13-19; 106(14):8. PubMed ID: 20446628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The history and use of the Waterlow card.
Waterlow J
Nurs Times; 1998 Feb 18-24; 94(7):63-7. PubMed ID: 9536738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Risk diagnoses by nurses are not a weather forecasts].
Balzer K
Pflege Z; 2010 Apr; 63(4):201. PubMed ID: 20429117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
