These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16422776)
21. Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: a systematic mapping review. Austvoll-Dahlgren A; Nsangi A; Semakula D Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):215. PubMed ID: 28034307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A review of decision support, risk communication and patient information tools for thrombolytic treatment in acute stroke: lessons for tool developers. Flynn D; Ford GA; Stobbart L; Rodgers H; Murtagh MJ; Thomson RG BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jun; 13():225. PubMed ID: 23777368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A summary to communicate evidence from systematic reviews to the public improved understanding and accessibility of information: a randomized controlled trial. Santesso N; Rader T; Nilsen ES; Glenton C; Rosenbaum S; Ciapponi A; Moja L; Pardo JP; Zhou Q; Schünemann HJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 25034199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visualizing risks in cancer communication: A systematic review of computer-supported visual aids. Stellamanns J; Ruetters D; Dahal K; Schillmoeller Z; Huebner J Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Aug; 100(8):1421-1431. PubMed ID: 28215828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How effective are 'age' tools at changing patient behaviour? A rapid review. Kulendrarajah B; Grey A; Nunan D BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Apr; 25(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 31558486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Bunge M; Mühlhauser I; Steckelberg A Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Mar; 78(3):316-28. PubMed ID: 20005067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Communicating the results of randomized clinical trials: do patients understand multidimensional patient-reported outcomes? McNair AG; Brookes ST; Davis CR; Argyropoulos M; Blazeby JM J Clin Oncol; 2010 Feb; 28(5):738-43. PubMed ID: 20065187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Hildon Z; Allwood D; Black N Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Feb; 24(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22166856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: a qualitative study. Brundage M; Leis A; Bezjak A; Feldman-Stewart D; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J Qual Life Res; 2003 Jun; 12(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 12797712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of different formats for information on side effects regarding medicine users' understanding: A randomized controlled trial. Moraes CG; da Silva Dal Pizzol T Patient Educ Couns; 2018 Apr; 101(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 29203083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new graphical format to communicate treatment effects to patients-A web-based randomized controlled trial. Kasper J; van de Roemer A; Pöttgen J; Rahn A; Backhus I; Bay Y; Köpke S; Heesen C Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 27981688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Translating evidence-based information into effective risk communication: current challenges and opportunities. Ghosh AK; Ghosh K J Lab Clin Med; 2005 Apr; 145(4):171-80. PubMed ID: 15962835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review. Waldron CA; van der Weijden T; Ludt S; Gallacher J; Elwyn G Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Feb; 82(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 20471766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effective teaching strategies and methods of delivery for patient education: a systematic review and practice guideline recommendations. Friedman AJ; Cosby R; Boyko S; Hatton-Bauer J; Turnbull G J Cancer Educ; 2011 Mar; 26(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 21161465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Communicating with patients through pictograms and pictures - a scoping review. Sedeh FB; Arvid Simon Henning M; Mortensen OS; Jemec GBE; Ibler KS J Dermatolog Treat; 2022 Sep; 33(6):2730-2737. PubMed ID: 35440279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The visual communication of risk. Lipkus IM; Hollands JG J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Communicating uncertainty in cancer prognosis: A review of web-based prognostic tools. Harrison M; Han PKJ; Rabin B; Bell M; Kay H; Spooner L; Peacock S; Bansback N Patient Educ Couns; 2019 May; 102(5):842-849. PubMed ID: 30579771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting cancer prognosis using interactive online tools: a systematic review and implications for cancer care providers. Rabin BA; Gaglio B; Sanders T; Nekhlyudov L; Dearing JW; Bull S; Glasgow RE; Marcus A Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1645-56. PubMed ID: 23956026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimising methods for communicating survival data to patients undergoing cancer surgery. Davis CR; McNair AG; Brigic A; Clarke MG; Brookes ST; Thomas MG; Blazeby JM Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3192-9. PubMed ID: 20728342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Designing Support to help Health Communication Professionals Convey Numbers Clearly to the Public - A Needs Assessment and Formative Usability Evaluation. Suresh U; Ancker JS; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Benda NC AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2023; 2023():1277-1286. PubMed ID: 38222428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]