These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423217)

  • 1. The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone.
    Steadman DW; DiAntonio LL; Wilson JJ; Sheridan KE; Tammariello SP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16423217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of different maceration techniques on nuclear DNA amplification using human bone.
    Lee EJ; Luedtke JG; Allison JL; Arber CE; Merriwether DA; Steadman DW
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1032-8. PubMed ID: 20384918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of skeletal preparation techniques on DNA from human and non-human bone.
    Rennick SL; Fenton TW; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Sep; 50(5):1016-9. PubMed ID: 16225205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth.
    Kemp BM; Smith DG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 16182949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enzymatic maceration of bone: a gentler technique than boiling.
    Uhre ML; Eriksen AM; Simonsen KP; Rasmussen AR; Hjort BB; Lynnerup N
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Apr; 55(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 24812061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of maceration techniques used to remove soft tissue from bone in cut mark analysis.
    King C; Birch W
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 25585666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of processing techniques on the forensic DNA analysis of human skeletal remains.
    Arismendi JL; Baker LE; Matteson KJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 15461092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods on bone and blood stains up to 43 years old and amplification of three different gene sequences.
    Cattaneo C; Craig OE; James NT; Sokol RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Nov; 42(6):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9397557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of common imaging and hot water maceration on DNA recovery from skeletal remains.
    Frank EM; Mundorff AZ; Davoren JM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():189-195. PubMed ID: 26363441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of different maceration techniques on burnt remains.
    Triaca A; Mahon TJ; Myburgh J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):676-682. PubMed ID: 34747030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommended Practices for Macerating Human Thyroid Cartilage.
    LaGoy A; Evangelou EA; Somogyi T; DiGangi EA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 32031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of different detergents in skeletal preparations.
    Mahon TJ; Maboke N; Myburgh J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110967. PubMed ID: 34455400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal remains presumed submerged in water for three years identified using PCR-STR analysis.
    Crainic K; Paraire F; Leterreux M; Durigon M; de Mazancourt P
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1025-7. PubMed ID: 12353539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods from Waterlogged Bones: A Pilot Study.
    Cartozzo C; Singh B; Boone E; Simmons T
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1830-1835. PubMed ID: 29649350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A modified mini-primer set for analyzing mitochondrial DNA control region sequences from highly degraded forensic samples.
    Lee HY; Kim NY; Park MJ; Yang WI; Shin KJ
    Biotechniques; 2008 Apr; 44(4):555-6, 558. PubMed ID: 18476821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for defleshing human remains using household bleach.
    Mann RW; Berryman HE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):440-2. PubMed ID: 22150429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraction of single-copy nuclear DNA from forensic specimens with a variety of postmortem histories.
    Evison MP; Smillie DM; Chamberlain AT
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Nov; 42(6):1032-8. PubMed ID: 9397544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved MtDNA sequence analysis of forensic remains using a "mini-primer set" amplification strategy.
    Gabriel MN; Huffine EF; Ryan JH; Holland MM; Parsons TJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Mar; 46(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 11305426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further evaluation of the efficacy of contamination removal from bone surfaces.
    Barta JL; Monroe C; Kemp BM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):340-8. PubMed ID: 23890658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.