331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423366)
21. Motor unit number estimates correlate with strength in polio survivors.
Sorenson EJ; Daube JR; Windebank AJ
Muscle Nerve; 2006 Nov; 34(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 16929544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of contraction intensity on motor unit number estimates of the tibialis anterior.
McNeil CJ; Doherty TJ; Stashuk DW; Rice CL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1342-7. PubMed ID: 15876553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Within-subject reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in a distal and proximal upper limb muscle.
Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Doherty TJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Mar; 117(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 16442341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bayesian statistical MUNE method.
Henderson RD; Ridall PG; Hutchinson NM; Pettitt AN; McCombe PA
Muscle Nerve; 2007 Aug; 36(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17487869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sources of error in the spike-triggered averaging method of motor unit number estimation (MUNE).
Bromberg MB; Abrams JL
Muscle Nerve; 1995 Oct; 18(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 7659108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inter-rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle.
Boe SG; Dalton BH; Harwood B; Doherty TJ; Rice CL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 19375385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The cross-correlation and phase-difference methods are not equivalent under noninvasive estimation of the motor unit propagation velocity.
Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV; Dimitrova NA
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 15094143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Motor unit number estimation--a Bayesian approach.
Ridall PG; Pettitt AN; Henderson RD; McCombe PA
Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1235-50. PubMed ID: 17156299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Approximation of motor unit structure from the analysis of motor unit potential.
Zalewska E; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Nov; 119(11):2501-6. PubMed ID: 18786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Number of Edb motor units estimated using an adapted multiple point stimulation method: normal values and longitudinal studies in ALS and peripheral neuropathies.
Albrecht E; Kuntzer T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):557-63. PubMed ID: 15036050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reproducibility of motor unit number index and multiple point stimulation motor unit number estimation in controls.
Higashihara M; Menon P; van den Bos M; Geevasinga N; Vucic S
Muscle Nerve; 2018 Nov; 58(5):660-664. PubMed ID: 30194855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of axonal loss in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies.
Lawson VH; Gordon Smith A; Bromberg MB
Exp Neurol; 2003 Dec; 184(2):753-7. PubMed ID: 14769367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lateral asymmetry of motor unit number estimate (MUNE).
Cuturic M; Shamsnia M; Palliyath S
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 45(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 16083147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Motor unit number estimation (mune) as a quantitative measure of disease progression and motor unit reorganization in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Sartucci F; Maritato P; Moscato G; Orlandi G; Calabrese R; Domenici GL; Murri L
Int J Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 117(9):1229-36. PubMed ID: 17654089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictive values of motor unit potential analysis in limb muscles.
Podnar S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):937-40. PubMed ID: 19329356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Needle electromyography.
Daube JR; Rubin DI
Muscle Nerve; 2009 Feb; 39(2):244-70. PubMed ID: 19145648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intersession reliability of H:M ratio is greater than the H-reflex at a percentage of M-max.
Hoch MC; Krause BA
Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 19116841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effects of gender and age on motor unit number estimation in a normal population.
Yerdelen D; Koç F; Sarica Y
Acta Neurol Belg; 2006 Mar; 106(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16776429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cremaster muscle motor unit action potentials.
Ozdemirkiran T; Ertekin C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 122(8):1679-85. PubMed ID: 21324736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Revised statistical motor unit number estimation in the Celecoxib/ALS trial.
Shefner JM; Cudkowicz ME; Zhang H; Schoenfeld D; Jillapalli D;
Muscle Nerve; 2007 Feb; 35(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 17058270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
