These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423743)
1. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm. Kawasaki Y; Yama H Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition. Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients. Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity. Knott LM; Dewhurst SA; Howe ML J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):229-39. PubMed ID: 21875250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions. Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views. Cabeza R; Lennartson ER Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15724903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of articulatory suppression on implicit and explicit false memory in the DRM paradigm. Van Damme I; Menten J; d'Ydewalle G Memory; 2010 Nov; 18(8):822-30. PubMed ID: 20924945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall. Tehan G Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Dec; 64(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21186910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Associative and categorical relations in the associative memory illusion. Park L; Shobe KK; Kihlstrom JF Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):792-7. PubMed ID: 16181442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An investigation of false memory in perceptual implicit tasks. McBride DM; Coane JH; Raulerson BA Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Nov; 123(3):240-60. PubMed ID: 16510106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children. Diliberto-Macaluso KA Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15822608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activating the critical lure during study is unnecessary for false recognition. Zeelenberg R; Boot I; Pecher D Conscious Cogn; 2005 Jun; 14(2):316-26. PubMed ID: 15950885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study. Boldini A; Beato MS; Cadavid S Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 23370492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury. Ries M; Marks W Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure. Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can test list context manipulations improve recognition accuracy in the DRM paradigm? Gunter RW; Ivanko SL; Bodner GE Memory; 2005 Nov; 13(8):862-73. PubMed ID: 16298893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False recall and recognition of brand names increases over time. Sherman SM Memory; 2013; 21(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 22963741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opposite developmental trends for false recognition of basic and superordinate names. Carneiro P; Albuquerque P; Fernandez A Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 19241218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]