These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423744)

  • 1. Effect of retention interval on the simultaneous cognate-noncognate and remember-know mirror effects.
    Algarabel S; Pitarque A; Gotor A
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16423744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context, remember-know recognition judgements, and ROC parameters.
    Algarabel S; Pitarque A
    Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):477-94. PubMed ID: 17613792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there a recognition memory deficit in Parkinson's disease? Evidence from estimates of recollection and familiarity.
    Weiermann B; Stephan MA; Kaelin-Lang A; Meier B
    Int J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 120(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 20374089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the origin of functional differences in recollective experience.
    Parkin AJ; Russo R
    Memory; 1993 Sep; 1(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 7584270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
    Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remember-Know judgments and retrieval of contextual details.
    Dudukovic NM; Knowlton BJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jun; 122(2):160-73. PubMed ID: 16405897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition memory and decision processes: a meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses.
    Gardiner JM; Ramponi C; Richardson-Klavehn A
    Memory; 2002 Mar; 10(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11798439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the validity of remember-know judgments: evidence from think aloud protocols.
    McCabe DP; Geraci L; Boman JK; Sensenig AE; Rhodes MG
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1625-33. PubMed ID: 21963257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.
    Hockley WE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1412-29. PubMed ID: 18980405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring the speed of the conscious components of recognition memory: remembering is faster than knowing.
    Dewhurst SA; Holmes SJ; Brandt KR; Dean GM
    Conscious Cogn; 2006 Mar; 15(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 16019226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1025-54. PubMed ID: 20836613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process.
    Slotnick SD
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 19937493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slow wave sleep and recollection in recognition memory.
    Daurat A; Terrier P; Foret J; Tiberge M
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):445-55. PubMed ID: 16877007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of pair collaboration and word-frequency in recognition memory: a study with the remember-know procedure.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Pieroni L; Spataro P; Cestari V
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Dec; 52(6):516-23. PubMed ID: 21923647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test context affects recollection and familiarity ratings: implications for measuring recognition experiences.
    Tousignant C; Bodner GE
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):994-1000. PubMed ID: 22309813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring recollection and familiarity: Improving the remember/know procedure.
    Migo EM; Mayes AR; Montaldi D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1435-55. PubMed ID: 22846231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recollection deficits in dysphoric mood: an effect of schematic models and executive mode?
    Ramponi C; Barnard PJ; Nimmo-Smith I
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):655-70. PubMed ID: 15615322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.