BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423746)

  • 1. Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.
    Andersson J; Hitch G; Meudell P
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 16423746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?
    Takahashi M; Saito S
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):722-31. PubMed ID: 15724361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment.
    Aslan A; Bauml KH
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):697-707. PubMed ID: 19575327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collaborative remembering of emotional events: the case of Rabin's assassination.
    Yaron-Antar A; Nachson I
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16423741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall: a gradual part-list cueing paradigm.
    Garrido MV; Garcia-Marques L; Hamilton DL
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 22411179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.
    Unsworth N
    Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):386-96. PubMed ID: 19358013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of automatic and controlled inhibitory retrieval processes in true and false recall.
    Knott LM; Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Dewhurst SA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 May; 109(1):91-108. PubMed ID: 21320706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2008 Apr; 16(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 18324549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval opportunities while multitasking improve name recall.
    Helder E; Shaughnessy JJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):896-909. PubMed ID: 18821268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual and conceptual cueing in implicit and explicit retrieval.
    Challis BH; Chiu CY; Kerr SA; Law J; Schneider L; Yonelinas A; Tulving E
    Memory; 1993 Jun; 1(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 7584262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directed forgetting in older adults using the item and list methods.
    Sego SA; Golding JM; Gottlob LR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006 Mar; 13(1):95-114. PubMed ID: 16766345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory retrieval in schizophrenia: evidence from part-list cuing.
    Kissler J; Bäuml KH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 May; 11(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15892903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.