These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423748)

  • 1. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
    Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can test list context manipulations improve recognition accuracy in the DRM paradigm?
    Gunter RW; Ivanko SL; Bodner GE
    Memory; 2005 Nov; 13(8):862-73. PubMed ID: 16298893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of rehearsal and generation in false memory creation.
    Marsh EJ; Bower GH
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):748-61. PubMed ID: 15724363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Providing information about diagnostic features at retrieval reduces false recognition.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Starns JJ; Villa D; Alonzo JD
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):836-51. PubMed ID: 18785056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valence and the development of immediate and long-term false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Candel I; Otgaar H; Malone C; Wimmer MC
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 20391177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can false memories spontaneously recover?
    Seamon JG; Berko JR; Sahlin B; Yu YL; Colker JM; Gottfried DH
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 16766445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of two-process theories of false recognition.
    Arndt J; Gould C
    Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):814-33. PubMed ID: 16938694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views.
    Cabeza R; Lennartson ER
    Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15724903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Boldini A; Beato MS; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 23370492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.
    Nabeta T; Kawahara J
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
    Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.