BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423748)

  • 1. Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.
    Dodd MD; Sheard ED; MacLeod CM
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 16423748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
    Ciaramelli E; Ghetti S; Frattarelli M; Làdavas E
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can test list context manipulations improve recognition accuracy in the DRM paradigm?
    Gunter RW; Ivanko SL; Bodner GE
    Memory; 2005 Nov; 13(8):862-73. PubMed ID: 16298893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.
    McCabe DP; Smith AD
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):570-83. PubMed ID: 16754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of rehearsal and generation in false memory creation.
    Marsh EJ; Bower GH
    Memory; 2004 Nov; 12(6):748-61. PubMed ID: 15724363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of associative strength in children's false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Wimmer MC; Blease K
    Memory; 2009 Jan; 17(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19031309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Providing information about diagnostic features at retrieval reduces false recognition.
    Lane SM; Roussel CC; Starns JJ; Villa D; Alonzo JD
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):836-51. PubMed ID: 18785056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valence and the development of immediate and long-term false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Candel I; Otgaar H; Malone C; Wimmer MC
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 20391177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can false memories spontaneously recover?
    Seamon JG; Berko JR; Sahlin B; Yu YL; Colker JM; Gottfried DH
    Memory; 2006 May; 14(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 16766445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of two-process theories of false recognition.
    Arndt J; Gould C
    Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):814-33. PubMed ID: 16938694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. False memory across languages: implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views.
    Cabeza R; Lennartson ER
    Memory; 2005 Jan; 13(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15724903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modality-match effect in false recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Boldini A; Beato MS; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Feb; 24(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 23370492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Congruency effect of presentation modality on false recognition of haptic and visual objects.
    Nabeta T; Kawahara J
    Memory; 2006 Apr; 14(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 16574587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Hancock TW; Hicks JL; Marsh RL; Ritschel L
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12710219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
    Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.