176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16423948)
1. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size.
Liberman L; Mason G; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):426-30. PubMed ID: 16423948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1223-30. PubMed ID: 22528918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates of reexcision for breast cancer after magnetic resonance imaging-guided bracket wire localization.
Wallace AM; Daniel BL; Jeffrey SS; Birdwell RL; Nowels KW; Dirbas FM; Schraedley-Desmond P; Ikeda DM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 200(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 15804466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frequency, upgrade rates, and characteristics of high-risk lesions initially identified with breast MRI.
Strigel RM; Eby PR; Demartini WB; Gutierrez RL; Allison KH; Peacock S; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 20729462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does size matter? Likelihood of cancer in MRI-detected lesions less than 5 mm.
Van den Bosch MA; Ikeda DM; Daniel BL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jun; 188(6):W571. PubMed ID: 17515352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Suspicious breast lesions detected at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: clinical and histological outcomes.
Johnson KS; Baker JA; Lee SS; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 22459645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient age and tumor size determine the cancer yield of preoperative bilateral breast MRI in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bae MS; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Seo M; Park IA; Han W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 23971464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Lee JM; Kaplan JB; Murray MP; Mazur-Grbec M; Tadic T; Stimac D; Liberman L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):468-74. PubMed ID: 17646475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement.
van de Ven SM; Lin MC; Daniel BL; Sareen P; Lipson JA; Pal S; Dirbas FM; Ikeda DM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jul; 32(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 20575077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Holland AE; Marjan D; Murray MP; Bartella L; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Wynn RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 17312054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complete excision of the MRI target lesion at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast cancer.
Lee JM; Kaplan JB; Murray MP; Liberman L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 191(4):1198-202. PubMed ID: 18806165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast MRI wire-guided excisional biopsy: specimen size as compared to mammogram wire-guided excisional biopsy and implications for use.
Javid SH; Carlson JW; Garber JE; Birdwell RL; Lester S; Lipsitz S; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):3352-8. PubMed ID: 17849165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.
Meeuwis C; Peters NH; Mali WP; Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Schipper ME; van den Bosch MA
Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 17218074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Lee MJ; Kaplan JB; LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Abramson AF; Dashnaw SM; Ballon DJ; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?
Linda A; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Lorenzon M; Londero V; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 22268168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
