BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16424249)

  • 1. Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging.
    Benacerraf BR; Shipp TD; Bromley B
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):988-96. PubMed ID: 16424249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal biometry: how well can offline measurements from three-dimensional volumes substitute real-time two-dimensional measurements?
    Sarris I; Ohuma E; Ioannou C; Sande J; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 42(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 23335102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How sonographic tomography will change the face of obstetric sonography: a pilot study.
    Benacerraf BR; Shipp TD; Bromley B
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Mar; 24(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15723850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F; Leung KY; Lee YP; Chan HY; Tang MH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
    Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective blinded comparison of second trimester fetal measurements by expert and novice readers using low-cost novice-acquired 3D volumetric ultrasound.
    Salinaro JR; McNally PJ; Nickenig Vissoci JR; Ellestad SC; Nelson B; Broder JS
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jun; 34(11):1805-1813. PubMed ID: 31352874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view.
    Pilu G; Segata M; Ghi T; Carletti A; Perolo A; Santini D; Bonasoni P; Tani G; Rizzo N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 27(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 16586477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of standard two-dimensional ultrasound to three-dimensional volume sonography for routine second-trimester fetal imaging.
    Roy-Lacroix ME; Moretti F; Ferraro ZM; Brosseau L; Clancy J; Fung-Kee-Fung K
    J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 37(4):380-386. PubMed ID: 28125099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of fetal anatomy in the first trimester using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Michailidis GD; Papageorgiou P; Economides DL
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Mar; 75(891):215-9. PubMed ID: 11932213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of fetal optic chiasm: an echoanatomic and reproducibility study.
    Paladini D; Birnbaum R; Donarini G; Maffeo I; Fulcheri E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 48(6):727-732. PubMed ID: 27514863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound does not improve training in fetal biometric measurements.
    Chan LW; Ting YH; Lao TT; Chau MM; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1173-5. PubMed ID: 21231840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal weight estimation by automated three-dimensional limb volume model in late third trimester compared to two-dimensional model: a cross-sectional prospective observational study.
    Wu X; Niu Z; Xu Z; Jiang Y; Zhang Y; Meng H; Ouyang Y
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):365. PubMed ID: 33964891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the equine fetus.
    Kotoyori Y; Yokoo N; Ito K; Murase H; Sato F; Korosue K; Nambo Y
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1480-6. PubMed ID: 22192400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the third-trimester fetus using 3-dimensional volumes: a pilot study.
    Bromley B; Shipp TD; Benacerraf B
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 17444536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional US of the fetus. Work in progress.
    Kelly IM; Gardener JE; Brett AD; Richards R; Lees WR
    Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):253-9. PubMed ID: 8208948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians.
    Capmas P; Salomon LJ; Picone O; Fuchs F; Frydman R; Senat MV
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Jan; 30(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19960449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional multiplanar ultrasound is a valuable tool in the study of the fetal profile in the second trimester of pregnancy.
    De Jong-Pleij EA; Ribbert LS; Tromp E; Bilardo CM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 20014328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Volumetric (3D) imaging reduces inter- and intraobserver variation of fetal biometry measurements.
    Chan LW; Fung TY; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19277977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is 3D technique superior to 2D in Down syndrome screening? Evaluation of six second and third trimester fetal profile markers.
    Vos FI; Bakker M; de Jong-Pleij EA; Ribbert LS; Tromp E; Bilardo CM
    Prenat Diagn; 2015 Mar; 35(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 25346246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy.
    Bega G; Lev-Toaff A; Kuhlman K; Berghella V; Parker L; Goldberg B; Wapner R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 16(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 11169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.