500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16424581)
1. Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Shandas R
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):557-73. PubMed ID: 16424581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves.
Zheng H; Mukdadi O; Kim H; Hertzberg JR; Shandas R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 15653236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transient subharmonic and ultraharmonic acoustic emission during dissolution of free gas bubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 16118987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonlinear ultrasonic propagation in bubbly liquids: a numerical model.
Vanhille C; Campos-Pozuelo C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 May; 34(5):792-808. PubMed ID: 18314254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction.
Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling of nonlinear effects and the response of ultrasound contrast micro bubbles: simulation and experiment.
Kvikliene A; Jurkonis R; Ressner M; Hoff L; Jansson T; Janerot-Sjöberg B; Lukosevicius A; Ask P
Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):301-7. PubMed ID: 15047302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction of a high-order Bessel beam with a submerged spherical ultrasound contrast agent shell - Scattering theory.
Mitri FG
Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 19833370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancement of subharmonic emission from encapsulated microbubbles by using a chirp excitation technique.
Zhang D; Gong Y; Gong X; Liu Z; Tan K; Zheng H
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5531-44. PubMed ID: 17804880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound attenuation in encapsulated microbubble suspensions: The multiple scattering effects.
Chen J; Zhu Z
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):961-9. PubMed ID: 16785017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fundamental study on subharmonic imaging by irradiation of amplitude-modulated ultrasound waves.
Maikusa N; Fukami T; Yuasa T; Tamura Y; Akatsuka T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):672-6. PubMed ID: 17614523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bubble dynamics involved in ultrasonic imaging.
Postema M; Schmitz G
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2006 May; 6(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 16706749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting backscatter characteristics from micron- and submicron-scale ultrasound contrast agents using a size-integration technique.
Zheng H; Barker A; Shandas R
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Mar; 53(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 16555773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse subtraction time delay imaging method for ultrasound contrast agent detection.
Borsboom JM; Bouakaz A; de Jong N
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1151-8. PubMed ID: 19574123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SURF imaging for contrast agent detection.
Hansen R; Angelsen BA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Feb; 56(2):280-90. PubMed ID: 19251515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling non-spherical oscillations and stability of acoustically driven shelled microbubbles.
Loughran J; Eckersley RJ; Tang MX
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4349-57. PubMed ID: 22712909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of nonlinear propagation in ultrasound contrast agent imaging.
Tang MX; Kamiyama N; Eckersley RJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 36(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 20133035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of fragmentation on the acoustic response from shrinking bubbles.
Bevan PD; Karshafian R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18343022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
