These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16424946)

  • 1. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Scollie S; Seewald R; Moodie S; Pumford J; Liu KP
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):199-226. PubMed ID: 16424946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: historical perspective and current issues.
    Seewald R; Moodie S; Scollie S; Bagatto M
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):145-57. PubMed ID: 16424944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aids in children: the importance of the verification and validation processes.
    Rissatto MR; Novaes BC
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 19629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
    Munro KJ; Millward KE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
    Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.
    Scollie S; Seewald R; Cornelisse L; Moodie S; Bagatto M; Laurnagaray D; Beaulac S; Pumford J
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):159-97. PubMed ID: 16424945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the real-ear to coupler difference transfer function with an insert earphone and a hearing instrument: are they the same?
    Munro KJ; Toal S
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 15692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
    Saunders GH; Morgan DE
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protocol for the provision of amplification within the Ontario infant hearing program.
    Bagatto M; Scollie SD; Hyde M; Seewald R
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S70-9. PubMed ID: 20109090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures.
    Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a probe-tube insertion technique for measuring the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD) in young infants.
    Bagatto MP; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Tharpe AM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):573-81. PubMed ID: 16999252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants.
    Bingham K; Jenstad LM; Shahnaz N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Oct; 20(9):558-68. PubMed ID: 19902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
    Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.