These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1034 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16425239)

  • 1. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    Clore GM; Robien MA; Gronenborn AM
    J Mol Biol; 1993 May; 231(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 8496968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting NMR data for beta-peptides using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Trzesniak D; Glättli A; Jaun B; van Gunsteren WF
    J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Oct; 127(41):14320-9. PubMed ID: 16218626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: a test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data.
    Stocker U; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2000 Jul; 40(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 10813839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated unfolded-state ensemble and the experimental NMR structures of villin headpiece yield similar wide-angle solution X-ray scattering profiles.
    Zagrovic B; Pande VS
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Sep; 128(36):11742-3. PubMed ID: 16953598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exact distances and internal dynamics of perdeuterated ubiquitin from NOE buildups.
    Vögeli B; Segawa TF; Leitz D; Sobol A; Choutko A; Trzesniak D; van Gunsteren W; Riek R
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Dec; 131(47):17215-25. PubMed ID: 19891472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural interpretation of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement-derived distances for disordered protein states.
    Ganguly D; Chen J
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Jul; 390(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 19447112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure and disorder in an unfolded state under nondenaturing conditions from ensemble models consistent with a large number of experimental restraints.
    Marsh JA; Forman-Kay JD
    J Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 391(2):359-74. PubMed ID: 19501099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain.
    Choy WY; Forman-Kay JD
    J Mol Biol; 2001 May; 308(5):1011-32. PubMed ID: 11352588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TOUCHSTONEX: protein structure prediction with sparse NMR data.
    Li W; Zhang Y; Kihara D; Huang YJ; Zheng D; Montelione GT; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):290-306. PubMed ID: 14517980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities.
    Nilges M
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Feb; 245(5):645-60. PubMed ID: 7844833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles.
    Mittag T; Forman-Kay JD
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 17250999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereospecific assignments of protein NMR resonances based on the tertiary structure and 2D/3D NOE data.
    Pristovsek P; Franzoni L
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Apr; 27(6):791-7. PubMed ID: 16526035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of long-range structure in the denatured state of staphylococcal nuclease. II. Distance restraints from paramagnetic relaxation and calculation of an ensemble of structures.
    Gillespie JR; Shortle D
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 268(1):170-84. PubMed ID: 9149150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpreting experimental data by using molecular simulation instead of model building.
    Gattin Z; Schwartz J; Mathad RI; Jaun B; van Gunsteren WF
    Chemistry; 2009 Jun; 15(26):6389-98. PubMed ID: 19462385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular dynamics and accuracy of NMR structures: effects of error bounds and data removal.
    Chalaoux FR; O'Donoghue SI; Nilges M
    Proteins; 1999 Mar; 34(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 10081958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Completely automated, highly error-tolerant macromolecular structure determination from multidimensional nuclear overhauser enhancement spectra and chemical shift assignments.
    Kuszewski J; Schwieters CD; Garrett DS; Byrd RA; Tjandra N; Clore GM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 May; 126(20):6258-73. PubMed ID: 15149223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relaxation data in NMR structure determination: model calculations for the lysozyme-Gd3+ complex.
    Sutcliffe MJ; Dobson CM
    Proteins; 1991; 10(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 1896425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error distribution derived NOE distance restraints.
    Nilges M; Habeck M; O'Donoghue SI; Rieping W
    Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(3):652-64. PubMed ID: 16729263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.