BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16427615)

  • 1. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
    Holroyd CB; Hajcak G; Larsen JT
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 16427615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.
    Holroyd CB; Pakzad-Vaezi KL; Krigolson OE
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):688-97. PubMed ID: 18513364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.
    Donkers FC; Nieuwenhuis S; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):777-87. PubMed ID: 16249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Schurger A; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2004 Jul; 14(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15054053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack.
    Hewig J; Trippe RH; Hecht H; Coles MG; Holroyd CB; Miltner WH
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 18761133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring.
    Müller SV; Möller J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Münte TF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15589185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.
    Hajcak G; Holroyd CB; Moser JS; Simons RF
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 15787853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain potentials associated with outcome expectation and outcome evaluation.
    Yu R; Zhou X
    Neuroreport; 2006 Oct; 17(15):1649-53. PubMed ID: 17001286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory-induced emotion modulates processes of response inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Yu F; Yuan J; Luo YJ
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18978645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To choose or to avoid: age differences in learning from positive and negative feedback.
    Eppinger B; Kray J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 19925176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise.
    Krigolson OE; Pierce LJ; Holroyd CB; Tanaka JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 18823237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physiological correlates of learning by performance feedback in children: a study of EEG event-related potentials and evoked heart rate.
    Groen Y; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Oct; 76(3):174-87. PubMed ID: 17888560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning by doing: an fMRI study of feedback-related brain activations.
    Marco-Pallarés J; Müller SV; Münte TF
    Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1423-6. PubMed ID: 17712267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Affective-motivational influences on feedback-related ERPs in a gambling task.
    Masaki H; Takeuchi S; Gehring WJ; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 16483556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retest reliability of medial frontal negativities during performance monitoring.
    Segalowitz SJ; Santesso DL; Murphy TI; Homan D; Chantziantoniou DK; Khan S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):260-70. PubMed ID: 20030755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.
    Yeung N; Holroyd CB; Cohen JD
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):535-44. PubMed ID: 15319308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback.
    Van Meel CS; Van Heijningen CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 20074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.