210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16427645)
1. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis.
Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
J Biomech; 2007; 40(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16427645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of boundary condition on the biomechanics of a human pelvic joint under an axial compressive load: a three-dimensional finite element model.
Hao Z; Wan C; Gao X; Ji T
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101006. PubMed ID: 22070331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
Viceconti M; Bellingeri L; Cristofolini L; Toni A
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jan; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9664280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur.
Grassi L; Hraiech N; Schileo E; Ansaloni M; Rochette M; Viceconti M
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21036655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies.
Viceconti M; Davinelli M; Taddei F; Cappello A
J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1597-605. PubMed ID: 15336935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subject-specific finite element simulation of the human femur considering inhomogeneous material properties: a straightforward method and convergence study.
Hölzer A; Schröder C; Woiczinski M; Sadoghi P; Scharpf A; Heimkes B; Jansson V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23084242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur.
Polgar K; Viceconti M; O'Connor JJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 11323989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image-based vs. mesh-based statistical appearance models of the human femur: implications for finite element simulations.
Bonaretti S; Seiler C; Boichon C; Reyes M; Büchler P
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25271191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated segmentation of cortical and trabecular bone to generate finite element models for femoral bone mechanics.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Venäläinen MS; Matikka H; Zheng Y; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Eng Phys; 2019 Aug; 70():19-28. PubMed ID: 31280927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography landmark-based semi-automated mesh morphing and mapping techniques: generation of patient specific models of the human pelvis without segmentation.
Salo Z; Beek M; Wright D; Whyne CM
J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1125-32. PubMed ID: 25680299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur.
Grassi L; Schileo E; Boichon C; Viceconti M; Taddei F
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Oct; 36(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 25128959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a hip joint model for finite volume simulations.
Cardiff P; Karač A; FitzPatrick D; Ivanković A
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Jan; 136(1):011006. PubMed ID: 24141555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to cemented acetabular replacements.
Zhang QH; Wang JY; Lupton C; Heaton-Adegbile P; Guo ZX; Liu Q; Tong J
J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2722-7. PubMed ID: 20655051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-D finite element analysis of the influence of synovial condition in sacroiliac joint on the load transmission in human pelvic system.
Shi D; Wang F; Wang D; Li X; Wang Q
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 24508529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures.
Couteau B; Payan Y; Lavallée S
J Biomech; 2000 Aug; 33(8):1005-9. PubMed ID: 10828331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur?
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Pakdel A; Whyne C; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():337-351. PubMed ID: 27450036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element study of human pelvis model in side impact for Chinese adult occupants.
Ma Z; Lan F; Chen J; Liu W
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 25133596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-specific geometrical modeling of orthopedic structures with high efficiency and accuracy for finite element modeling and 3D printing.
Huang H; Xiang C; Zeng C; Ouyang H; Wong KK; Huang W
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):743-53. PubMed ID: 26577713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
