These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16427645)

  • 21. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; Cataldi M; Taddei F; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(14):2356-62. PubMed ID: 23972430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
    Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity to model geometry in finite element analyses of reconstructed skeletal structures: experience with a juvenile pelvis.
    Watson PJ; Fagan MJ; Dobson CA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Jan; 229(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 25542612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The finite element modeling of human pelvis and its application in medicolegal expertise].
    Li ZD; Zou DH; Liu NG; Huang P; Chen YJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 26(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 21425599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A NURBS-based technique for subject-specific construction of knee bone geometry.
    Au AG; Palathinkal D; Liggins AB; Raso VJ; Carey J; Lambert RG; Amirfazli A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 18644314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new method for the automatic mesh generation of bone segments from CT data.
    Viceconti M; Zannoni C; Testi D; Cappello A
    J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10356679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CT data sets surface extraction for biomechanical modeling of long bones.
    Viceconti M; Zannoni C; Testi D; Cappello A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1999 Jun; 59(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 10386765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subject specific finite element mesh generation of the pelvis from biplanar x-ray images: application to 120 clinical cases.
    Fougeron N; Rohan PY; Macron A; Travert C; Pillet H; Skalli W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Apr; 21(5):408-412. PubMed ID: 29969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Anatomical comparison and evaluation of human proximal femurs modeling via different devices and FEM analysis.
    Verim Ö; Taşgetiren S; Er MS; Timur M; Yuran AF
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22711421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Automated finite element analysis of excised human femora based on precision -QCT.
    Merz B; Niederer P; Müller R; Rüegsegger P
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 Aug; 118(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 8872261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.
    Baca V; Horak Z; Mikulenka P; Dzupa V
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Sep; 30(7):924-30. PubMed ID: 18243761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging.
    Barratt DC; Chan CS; Edwards PJ; Penney GP; Slomczykowski M; Carter TJ; Hawkes DJ
    Med Image Anal; 2008 Jun; 12(3):358-74. PubMed ID: 18313973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impingement simulation of the hip in SCFE using 3D models.
    Richolt JA; Teschner M; Everett PC; Millis MB; Kikinis R
    Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 10528271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient-specific modelling of the foot: automated hexahedral meshing of the bones.
    Lievers WB; Kent RW
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(12):1287-97. PubMed ID: 22436002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction of the structural response of the femoral shaft under dynamic loading using subject-specific finite element models.
    Park G; Kim T; Forman J; Panzer MB; Crandall JR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Aug; 20(11):1151-1166. PubMed ID: 28632407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element model development of a child pelvis with optimization-based material identification.
    Kim JE; Li Z; Ito Y; Huber CD; Shih AM; Eberhardt AW; Yang KH; King AI; Soni BK
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2191-5. PubMed ID: 19646702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modelling of the human pelvis.
    Salo Z; Beek M; Whyne CM
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2012 Aug; 28(8):904-13. PubMed ID: 25099570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties.
    Bryan R; Mohan PS; Hopkins A; Galloway F; Taylor M; Nair PB
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 19932044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.