393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16427688)
1. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer.
Soutter WP; Hanoch J; D'Arcy T; Dina R; McIndoe GA; DeSouza NM
BJOG; 2004 Jul; 111(7):741-7. PubMed ID: 15198766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of the primary site in stage I cervical carcinoma: A comparison of endovaginal coil with external phased array coil techniques at 0.5T.
deSouza NM; Whittle M; Williams AD; Sohail M; Krausz T; Gilderdale DJ; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Dec; 12(6):1020-6. PubMed ID: 11105045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.
Wagenaar HC; Trimbos JB; Postema S; Anastasopoulou A; van der Geest RJ; Reiber JH; Kenter GG; Peters AA; Pattynama PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 11520143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Magnetic resonance in the evaluation of parametrial involvement in carcinoma of the cervix uteri].
Fischetti SG; Coppolino F; Priolo GD; Chiarenza R; Garufi A; Privitera G; Materazzo S; Loreto C
Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):470-9. PubMed ID: 1767055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer?
Chung HH; Kang SB; Cho JY; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim SH; Lee HP
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 May; 37(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 17556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of invasive cervical cancer: an in vivo study with ex vivo corroboration.
Mahon MM; Williams AD; Soutter WP; Cox IJ; McIndoe GA; Coutts GA; Dina R; deSouza NM
NMR Biomed; 2004 Feb; 17(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15011245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical staging and histopathological findings after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.
Mandic A; Novakovic P; Mihajlovic O; Stojiljkovic B; Rajovic J; Davidovic M
J BUON; 2008; 13(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18404786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging.
Yu KK; Hricak H; Subak LL; Zaloudek CJ; Powell CB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 9725301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.
Narayan K; McKenzie A; Fisher R; Susil B; Jobling T; Bernshaw D
Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e163-8. PubMed ID: 14528092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy.
Wright JD; Grigsby PW; Brooks R; Powell MA; Gibb RK; Gao F; Rader JS; Mutch DG
Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(6):1281-6. PubMed ID: 17654664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and cause of pitfalls in detecting myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in endometrial cancer.
Sanjuán A; Escaramís G; Ayuso JR; Román SM; Torné A; Ordi J; Lejárcegui JA; Pahisa J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 278(6):535-9. PubMed ID: 18368415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contribution of the sentinel node procedure to tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Daraï E; Lavoué V; Rouzier R; Coutant C; Barranger E; Bats AS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 17490734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix].
Pellegrino A; Cormio G; Maneo A; Vanzulli A; Villa G; Lissoni A; Landoni F
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Dec; 47(12):523-6. PubMed ID: 8720972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Carcinoma of the uterine cervical canal. Staging and biometric assessment with magnetic resonance].
Fischetti SG; Politi G; Lomeo E; Garozzo G; Di Leo S; Nuciforo G
Radiol Med; 1994 Oct; 88(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 7997618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
