These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16428056)
1. Head-mounted versus remote eye tracking of radiologists searching for breast cancer: a comparison. Mello-Thoms C; Britton C; Abrams G; Hakim C; Shah R; Hardesty L; Maitz G; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 16428056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading? Mello-Thoms C Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading. Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The problem of image interpretation in mammography: effects of lesion conspicuity on the visual search strategy of radiologists. Mello-Thoms C Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S111-6. PubMed ID: 17209115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety. Krupinski EA Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16023379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms. Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrence quantification analysis of radiologists' scanpaths when interpreting mammograms. Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3052-3062. PubMed ID: 29694675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study. Mall S; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):746-760. PubMed ID: 31410677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography. Tourassi GD; Mazurowski MA; Harrawood BP; Krupinski EA Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5728-36. PubMed ID: 21158284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. Krupinski EA; Roehrig H Acad Radiol; 2000 Jan; 7(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10645452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interactive eye-tracking system for measuring radiologists' visual fixations in volumetric CT images: Implementation and initial eye-tracking accuracy validation. Gong H; Hsieh SS; Holmes DR; Cook DA; Inoue A; Bartlett DJ; Baffour F; Takahashi H; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6710-6723. PubMed ID: 34534365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Blane C; Paramagul C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson S; Adler D; Nees A; Shen J Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 15317954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms. Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 18572124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]