98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16428056)
1. Head-mounted versus remote eye tracking of radiologists searching for breast cancer: a comparison.
Mello-Thoms C; Britton C; Abrams G; Hakim C; Shah R; Hardesty L; Maitz G; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 16428056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?
Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The problem of image interpretation in mammography: effects of lesion conspicuity on the visual search strategy of radiologists.
Mello-Thoms C
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S111-6. PubMed ID: 17209115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety.
Krupinski EA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16023379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recurrence quantification analysis of radiologists' scanpaths when interpreting mammograms.
Gandomkar Z; Tay K; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3052-3062. PubMed ID: 29694675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.
Mall S; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):746-760. PubMed ID: 31410677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.
Tourassi GD; Mazurowski MA; Harrawood BP; Krupinski EA
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5728-36. PubMed ID: 21158284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search.
Krupinski EA; Roehrig H
Acad Radiol; 2000 Jan; 7(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 10645452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.
Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Conant EF; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 17255410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interactive eye-tracking system for measuring radiologists' visual fixations in volumetric CT images: Implementation and initial eye-tracking accuracy validation.
Gong H; Hsieh SS; Holmes DR; Cook DA; Inoue A; Bartlett DJ; Baffour F; Takahashi H; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6710-6723. PubMed ID: 34534365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Blane C; Paramagul C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson S; Adler D; Nees A; Shen J
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 15317954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using gaze-tracking data and mixture distribution analysis to support a holistic model for the detection of cancers on mammograms.
Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 18572124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
