These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

890 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16428237)

  • 1. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of alaryngeal voice and speech.
    Globlek D; Stajner-Katusic S; Musura M; Horga D; Liker M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2004; 29(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15260185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of alaryngeal speech using a sound-producing voice prosthesis in relation to sex and pharyngoesophageal segment tonicity.
    van der Torn M; van Gogh CD; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Verkerke GJ; Mahieu HF
    Head Neck; 2006 May; 28(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 16470874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech.
    Kazi R; Kiverniti E; Prasad V; Venkitaraman R; Nutting CM; Clarke P; Rhys-Evans P; Harrington KJ
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 31(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 17184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative acoustic analysis of voice production by near-total laryngectomy and normal laryngeal speakers.
    Hoasjoe DK; Martin GF; Doyle PC; Wong FS
    J Otolaryngol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 1564748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The voice and speech quality in laryngectomy patients rehabilitated with second generation voice prosthesis].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Łuczaj J; Kasperuk J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Sep; 25(147):230-5. PubMed ID: 19112837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acoustic voice analysis in phonatory fistuloplasty after total laryngectomy].
    Rosique M; Ramón JL; Campos M; Cervantes J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10217687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative voice after laryngectomy using a sound-producing voice prosthesis.
    van der Torn M; de Vries MP; Festen JM; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Mahieu HF
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11210885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of a double-membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized patients.
    Tack JW; Rakhorst G; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
    Head Neck; 2007 Jul; 29(7):665-74. PubMed ID: 17252591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective and subjective assessment of tracheoesophageal prosthesis voice outcome.
    D'Alatri L; Bussu F; Scarano E; Paludetti G; Marchese MR
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 22209062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
    Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Voice prostheses or esophageal replacement voice?].
    Daniilidis I; Nikolaou A; Markou C; Kotsani A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Feb; 77(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 9555702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative evaluation of the voice prosthesis after laryngectomy].
    Kischk BT; Gross M
    HNO; 1995 May; 43(5):304-10. PubMed ID: 7607916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Voice quality in laryngectomees with phonatory prosthesis].
    Ruiz Franco M; Miralles Adell JL; Marco Algarra J; García Rodríguez A; Armengot Carceller M
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1989; 40(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 2631908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a membrane-based voice-producing element for laryngectomized women.
    Tack JW; Qiu Q; Schutte HK; Kooijman PG; Meeuwis CA; van der Houwen EB; Mahieu HF; Verkerke GJ
    Head Neck; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1156-66. PubMed ID: 18642281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral, cepstral, and multivariate exploration of tracheoesophageal voice quality in continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Dick C; Vandenbruaene C; Vauterin T; Jacobs T
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Dec; 119(12):2384-94. PubMed ID: 19718753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.