These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

890 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16428237)

  • 21. Perceptual evaluation and acoustic analysis of pneumatic artificial larynx.
    Xu JJ; Chen X; Lu MP; Qiao MZ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Dec; 141(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 19932853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech, with an emphasis on the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Jongmans P; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):172-81. PubMed ID: 17114130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparative study of temporal parameters of alaryngeal voices. Esophageal and tracheo-esophageal voices].
    Crevier-Buchman L; Pfauwadel MC; Chabardes E; Laccourreye O; Brasnu D; Laccourreye H
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1991; 108(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 1759741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [How good is the esophageal voice?].
    Brusis T; Schöning A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Nov; 63(11):585-8. PubMed ID: 6521588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality of 'glottal' stops in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    van Rossum MA; van As-Brooks CJ; Hilgers FJ; Roozen M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 19148810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Wong J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):780-9. PubMed ID: 18978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox tracheosophageal voice prostheses.
    Chung RP; Patel P; Ter Keurs M; Van Lith Bijl JT; Mahieu HF
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 10089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl DA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal and perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal voice.
    Williams SE; Scanio TS; Ritterman SI
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Aug; 99(8 Pt 1):846-50. PubMed ID: 2755293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Acoustic analysis of the voice restored by using a tracheoesophageal slit-like fistula].
    Jin GW; Yang CH; Xu KX; Xu ZR; Li SC; Chen J; Zhang JX; Zhang ZL
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 14515786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal speech production using the new indwelling Provox Vega voice prosthesis: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
    Ward EC; Hancock K; Lawson N; van As-Brooks CJ
    Head Neck; 2011 Jan; 33(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20848411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of aberrant acoustic properties on the perception of sound quality in electrolarynx speech.
    Meltzner GS; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):766-79. PubMed ID: 16378472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tracheoesophageal speech: with and without tracheostoma valve.
    Zanoff DJ; Wold D; Montague JC; Krueger K; Drummond S
    Laryngoscope; 1990 May; 100(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 2329907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic markers of prosodic boundaries in Spanish spontaneous alaryngeal speech.
    Cuenca MH; Barrio MM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Nov; 24(11):859-69. PubMed ID: 20964504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and evaluation of on/off control for electrolaryngeal speech via artificial neural network based on visual information of lips.
    Wu L; Wan C; Wang S; Wan M
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):259.e7-259.e16. PubMed ID: 23294707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech.
    Op de Coul BM; Ackerstaff AH; van As-Brooks CJ; van den Hoogen FJ; Meeuwis CA; Manni JJ; Hilgers FJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 16076712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.