333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16429699)
1. Zirconium implant abutments: fracture strength and influence of cyclic loading on retaining-screw loosening.
Gehrke P; Dhom G; Brunner J; Wolf D; Degidi M; Piattelli A
Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 16429699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Different Screw Torque Levels on the Biomechanical Behavior of Tapered Prosthetic Abutments.
Herbst PE; de Carvalho EB; Salatti RC; Valgas L; Tiossi R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(3):536–540. PubMed ID: 29420673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical integrity of cement- and screw-retained zirconium-lithium silicate glass-ceramic crowns to Morse taper implants.
Vahey BR; Sordi MB; Stanley K; Magini RS; Novaes de Oliveira AP; Fredel MC; Henriques B; Souza JCM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):721-731. PubMed ID: 30093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the difference between implant body and screw materials on abutment screw loosening.
Shinohara R; Ueda K; Watanabe F
Dent Mater J; 2019 Feb; 38(1):150-156. PubMed ID: 30449828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.
Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.
Lang LA; Kang B; Wang RF; Lang BR
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 14668754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A pilot study of joint stability at the zirconium or titanium abutment/titanium implant interface.
Cavusoglu Y; Akça K; Gürbüz R; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):338-43. PubMed ID: 24683559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro comparison of fracture load of zirconia custom abutments with internal connection and different angulations and thickness: part I.
Albosefi A; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 24417713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
