These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16430012)

  • 21. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Liu JK; Chao CC; Liao FP; Chen YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11208208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
    Cenci MS; Lund RG; Pereira CL; de Carvalho RM; Demarco FF
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reduction of polymerization shrinkage stress and marginal microleakage using soft-start polymerization.
    Ernst CP; Brand N; Frommator U; Rippin G; Willershausen B
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(2):93-103; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 12762473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based filling materials cured using a 'soft-start' polymerisation protocol.
    Fleming GJ; Cara RR; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 16843523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage.
    Wagner WC; Aksu MN; Neme AM; Linger JB; Pink FE; Walker S
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18335736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of stepped exposure on quantitative in vitro marginal microleakage.
    Santos AJ; Lisso MT; Aguiar FH; França FM; Lovadino JR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(4):236-42; discussion 243. PubMed ID: 16231494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of different resin composite types.
    Yazici AR; Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):790-4. PubMed ID: 15553287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
    Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.