These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16430624)
1. Location of a positive biopsy as a predictor of surgical margin status and extraprostatic disease in radical prostatectomy. Touma NJ; Chin JL; Bella T; Sener A; Izawa JI BJU Int; 2006 Feb; 97(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 16430624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative prostate examination: predictive value and effect on margin status. Rapp DE; Orvieto MA; Lucioni A; Gong EM; Shalhav AL; Brendler CB BJU Int; 2005 Nov; 96(7):1005-8. PubMed ID: 16225517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features. Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The total percentage of biopsy cores with cancer improves the prediction of pathological stage after radical prostatectomy. Winkler MH; Khan FA; Kulinskaya E; Hoh IM; McDonald D; Boustead G; Kaisary AV BJU Int; 2004 Oct; 94(6):812-5. PubMed ID: 15476514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side specific extraprostatic cancer extension. Naya Y; Slaton JW; Troncoso P; Okihara K; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1093-7. PubMed ID: 14767278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are prostate needle biopsies predictive of the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins? Frota R; Stein RJ; Turna B; Kamoi K; Lin YC; Magi-Galluzzi C; Aron M; Gill IS BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1599-603. PubMed ID: 19583724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of radial distance of extraprostatic extension from pretherapy factors. Schwartz DJ; Sengupta S; Hillman DW; Sargent DJ; Cheville JC; Wilson TM; Mynderse LA; Choo R; Davis BJ Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):411-8. PubMed ID: 17869661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer. Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins. Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer. Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. Orvieto MA; Alsikafi NF; Shalhav AL; Laven BA; Steinberg GD; Zagaja GP; Brendler CB BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 17125478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading. Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]